# Impact of Drying and Storage Conditions on the Bioactive and Nutritional Properties of Malolactic Wine Lees

**Authors:** Roberta Barreto de Andrade Bulos, Carolina Oliveira de Souza, Cedenir Pereira de Quadros, Otávio Augusto Durando Leme, Luiz Claudio Corrêa, Maria Beatriz Prior Pinto Oliveira, Susana Machado, Aline Camarão Telles Biasoto, Pedro Paulo Lordelo Guimarães Tavares, Renata Quartieri Nascimento, Marcelo Andrés Umsza-Guez

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/foods14223852 · Foods · 2025-11-11

## TL;DR

This study examines how drying and storage affect the nutritional and bioactive properties of wine lees, finding that oven drying is more suitable for large-scale use despite freeze-drying better preserving phenolics.

## Contribution

The study compares oven and freeze-drying methods for wine lees preservation, identifying their impacts on bioactive compounds and scalability.

## Key findings

- Freeze-dried lees showed higher phenolic content (77.92 mg GAE/g) compared to oven-dried lees.
- Oven drying resulted in greater antioxidant activity, possibly due to thermal processing effects.
- Storage time significantly affected all evaluated parameters, highlighting the importance of drying method on stability.

## Abstract

Wine lees, a winemaking by-product, have high potential for reuse due to their significant phenolic content and antioxidant capacity. To preserve their composition and enhance their feasibility for incorporation into food products, this study evaluated the effects of oven drying (40 °C) and freeze-drying on the physicochemical and nutritional characteristics of malolactic lees, as well as the impact of the storage time. Samples were analyzed at 0, 45, and 90 days of storage at 25 °C under light exposure conditions. Total phenolic content was determined by Folin–Ciocalteu, antioxidant activity by DPPH and FRAP assays, and phenolic groups by HPLC-DAD-FD. Both methods preserved a high protein content (~20%), with 44.66% essential amino acids and an essential amino acid index of 1.55, indicating high-quality proteins. The freeze-dried lees showed a higher phenolic content (77.92 mg GAE/g), whereas the oven-dried lees exhibited greater antioxidant activity, likely due to the formation or release of bound phenolic compounds induced by thermal processing. Among the phenolic groups, tannins were the most favored in terms of preservation. Storage time significantly influenced the parameters evaluated, indicating the impact of drying on stability. While freeze-drying better preserved phenolic compounds, oven drying was considered the most suitable option for large-scale application.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** GAE (PubChem CID 3037582)

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** essential amino acid (MESH:D000601), DPPH (MESH:C004931), tannins (MESH:D013634), GAE (-)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12651660/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12651660/full.md

## References

77 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12651660/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12651660