Gastric Glomus Tumor with Neuroendocrine Features: A Diagnostic Pitfall for Neuroendocrine Tumors
Dae Hyun Song, Tae-Han Kim, Hyo Jung An

TL;DR
A rare gastric glomus tumor was misdiagnosed as a neuroendocrine tumor, highlighting the importance of specific immunostaining for accurate diagnosis.
Contribution
This case emphasizes the diagnostic value of smooth muscle actin staining in distinguishing glomus tumors from neuroendocrine tumors.
Findings
Histology showed small round cells in nests and trabeculae with vessel-rich stroma and focal calcification.
Immunohistochemistry was negative for CD117, HMB45, and chromogranin A but positive for smooth muscle actin.
The diagnosis of gastric glomus tumor was confirmed, emphasizing the need for specific markers in limited biopsy samples.
Abstract
A 60-year-old woman with hypertension and hyperlipidemia was referred for an incidentally detected gastric subepithelial mass during screening endoscopy. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed a 10 mm dimple in the antrum, and contrast-enhanced CT showed a 2.5 cm enhancing oval lesion. Laparoscopic partial gastrectomy with intraoperative endoscopic guidance was performed. Gross examination revealed a 3.0 × 2.0 × 1.0 cm pale, firm nodule. Histology showed small round cells arranged in nests and trabeculae within the muscularis propria, with numerous vessels and focal calcification. Immunohistochemistry was negative for CD117, HMB45, and chromogranin A, but demonstrated strong smooth muscle actin positivity, weak synaptophysin reactivity, and focal CD56 staining. The findings confirmed a gastric glomus tumor with neuroendocrine features. Smooth muscle actin immunostaining is essential to…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSoft tissue tumors and treatment · Head and Neck Anomalies · Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Tsagkataki E.S. Flamourakis M.E. Gkionis I.G. Giakoumakis M.I. Delimpaltadakis G.N. Kazamias G.M. Giannikaki E.S. Christodoulakis M.S. Gastric glomus tumor: A case report and review of the literature J. Med. Case Rep.20211541510.1186/s 13256-021-03011-034392835 PMC 8365960 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Pansa A. Sama L. Ruspi L. Sicoli F. Cananzi F.C.M. Quagliuolo V. Glomus Tumor of the Stomach: A Systematic Review and Illustrative Case Report Dig. Dis.202341173310.1159/00052551335753305 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Khan J. Cramer H.M. Dave N. Segura S. Gastric glomus tumor mimicking neuroendocrine tumor on fine needle aspiration: A diagnostic pitfall Am. J. Clin. Pathol.2023160 S 22S 2310.1093/ajcp/aqad 150.049 · doi ↗
- 4Dhorajiya P. Samuel J. Mahabir R. Sharabi A. Gastric Glomus Tumor: A Rare Gastric Tumor Featuring Small Round Blue Cell; Diagnostic Pitfall for Carcinoid Tumor Am. J. Clin. Pathol.2018150 S 2910.1093/ajcp/aqy 090.072 · doi ↗
- 5Ezeh K.J. Boateng W. Paudel B. Ezeudemba O. Botros Y. A Case of Gastric Glomus Tumor Misdiagnosed as Carcinoid Tumor Cureus 202315 e 3431610.7759/cureus.3431636860216 PMC 9970792 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Koseoglu H. Duzenli T. Sezikli M. Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms: A review World J. Clin. Cases 202197973798510.12998/wjcc.v 9.i 27.797334621854 PMC 8462212 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Wang Z.B. Yuan J. Shi H.Y. Features of gastric glomus tumor: A clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical and molecular retrospective study Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol.201471438144824817939 PMC 4014223 · pubmed ↗
- 8Miettinen M. Paal E. Lasota J. Sobin L.H. Gastrointestinal glomus tumors: A clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 32 cases Am. J. Surg. Pathol.20022630131110.1097/00000478-200203000-0000311859201 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
