# Utility of REMS-Derived Fragility Score and Trabecular Bone Score in Evaluating Bone Health in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

## TL;DR

This study explores how REMS and TBS can better assess bone health in Type 2 diabetes patients, who are at higher fracture risk despite normal bone density.

## Contribution

The study introduces REMS-derived fragility score and TBS as improved tools for evaluating bone quality in Type 2 diabetes.

## Key findings

- REMS BMD T-scores were significantly lower than DXA at lumbar and femoral sites in T2DM patients.
- Patients with prior fractures had lower TBS and higher FS values compared to those without fractures.
- REMS parameters may improve osteoporosis diagnosis and fracture risk assessment in T2DM.

## Abstract

Background/Objectives: A significantly higher fracture risk characterizes Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients when compared to the non-diabetic population, even though their average bone mineral density (BMD) tends to be normal or high. This elevated risk is primarily driven by defective bone quality. The trabecular bone score (TBS) and radiofrequency echographic multispectrometry (REMS) have recently been proposed to improve the assessment of bone quality in T2DM individuals. This study aimed to evaluate whether TBS and REMS can improve the identification of osteoporosis and fracture risk in these patients. Methods: BMD was measured in 223 consecutive T2DM patients (126 women and 97 man) and 102 controls. BMD values for the lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN), and total hip (TH) were obtained via both dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and radiofrequency echographic multi-spectrometry (REMS). In all patients, TBS and Fragility Score (FS) by REMS were measured and prior major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) were assessed. Results: All BMD T-scores measured by REMS were significantly lower than those obtained by DXA at both lumbar and femoral sites. T2DM patients with previous MOF exhibited lower T-scores for both BMD-LS and BMD-TH, as assessed by DXA and REMS, compared with patients without fractures. However, these differences reached statistical significance for BMD-TH with both techniques and for BMD-LS with REMS, but not for BMD-LS with DXA. Moreover, patients with a history of MOF had significantly lower TBS values (p < 0.05) and significantly higher FS values at both lumbar (p < 0.05) and femoral (p < 0.01) sites compared with those without fractures. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that the parameters obtained using REMS technology (BMD and FS) may be valuable tools for improving the diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessing fracture risk in patients with T2DM.