Real-World Data of Light Chain (AL) Amyloidosis: Prognostic Indices and Treatment Patterns

TL;DR

This study analyzes real-world data of 60 patients with AL amyloidosis to evaluate treatment patterns and outcomes, finding that Bortezomib-based regimens improve survival.

Contribution

The study provides real-world insights into treatment effectiveness and prognostic factors for AL amyloidosis patients.

Findings

Bortezomib-based regimens improved hematologic, cardiac, and renal response rates compared to other treatments.

Patients treated with CyBorD + HDT + ASCT had significantly better overall survival.

Advanced cardiac involvement remains a key adverse prognostic factor.

Abstract

Background: Limited real-world data (RWD) may provide important information regarding diagnostic and treatment patterns in patients (pts) with AL Amyloidosis. The aim was to analyze the characteristics, treatment approach and clinical outcome of patients in the real-world settings. Materials and Methods: RWD of 60 pts diagnosed with AL amyloidosis were analyzed. Advanced cardiac involvement, Mayo Clinical Stage (CS) IIIa and IIIb, and Revised-Mayo CS III and IV, has been found in 26.7%, and 16.7%, or 33.3% and 16.7%, respectively. Bortezomib (Bz)-based regimens were applied in 36 pts (60%), and alkylating-based regimens in 24 pts (40%). In 8 pts (13.3%) treated initially with CyBorD induction, high-dose therapy with Melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT + ASCT) was applied as the first line of treatment. Results: The overall response rate (ORR, ≥partial response) was achieved in 40 pts (70%). Patients treated with Bz-based induction followed by HDT + ASCT achieved significantly better hematologic (p = 0.001), cardiac (p = 0.004) and renal response rates (p = 0.002) in comparison to CyBorD or Alk-based regimens alone. There was no difference in PFS between those groups (p = 0.733), but patients treated with CyBorD + HDT + ASCT had significantly durable OS (p = 0.039). Univariate analysis pointed out the predictive influence of cardiac involvement (Mayo CS and Revised Mayo CS), ASCT eligibility, and hematologic, cardiac, renal and composite response rates. Conclusions: Advanced cardiac involvement and cardiac and hematologic response still retain adverse prognostic impact on the clinical outcome. Bz-based combinations significantly improved the survival of patients with AL amyloidosis, regardless of HDT + ASCT treatment.

Figures