Uterine Contractility Changes in Adenomyosis: Evidence from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

TL;DR

This study finds that women with adenomyosis have altered uterine contractions, which may affect fertility and require further research for better diagnosis and treatment.

Contribution

The study provides the first meta-analysis evidence of altered uterine peristalsis patterns in adenomyosis patients.

Findings

Women with adenomyosis showed significantly reduced uterine contraction frequency compared to controls.

Adenomyosis patients had fewer antegrade contractions and more retrograde contractions.

Results showed substantial heterogeneity, suggesting the need for larger studies.

Abstract

Background: The presence of ectopic endometrial glands within the uterine myometrium in patients with adenomyosis has been associated with adverse fertility outcomes. UP (Uterine Peristalsis), a movement of contractions at the junctional zone of the non-pregnant uterus, can be impacted by an altered architecture of uterine layers. Abnormal contractility patterns could impact both uterotubal sperm transport as well as embryo implantation. Because of this potential influence on clinical symptoms and reproduction in patients with adenomyosis, studies have been analyzing the feasibility of diagnostic techniques in assessing uterine peristalsis. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to detect an alteration in patterns of UP in patients with adenomyosis. Methods: A systematic literature search of Medline, Embase, Cochrane, CENTRAL databases and Google Scholar was conducted up to June 2025, including studies evaluating UP and adenomyosis. Clinical studies evaluating uterine contractility were included, excluding those potentially affected by therapeutic interventions. The meta-analysis pooled data from studies to compare uterine contractility direction between patients with adenomyosis and control groups. Results: In seven included studies (442 women), uterine contractility varied significantly in association with menstrual cycle phases and pathological conditions. The meta-analysis revealed two statistically significant findings: women with adenomyosis showed significantly reduced uterine contraction frequency (SMD −1.81, 95% CI: −3.04 to −0.58, p = 0.0039) and fewer antegrade contractions (OR 0.35, 95% CI: 0.13–0.96, p = 0.0423) compared to controls. Other contractility patterns showed non-significant trends with substantial heterogeneity. Conclusions: Our findings show a significant difference in uterine contraction patterns in patients with adenomyosis compared to controls, namely a decrease in frequency and an increased number of retrograde uterine contractions in the adenomyosis group. The remarkable heterogeneity of the results highlighted the need for larger study cohorts in the future, especially to address the main diagnostic possibilities and treatments in order to improve reproductive outcomes.

Figures