# NMR-Based Metabolomics Reveals Position-Specific Signatures Associated with Physical Demands in Professional Soccer Players

## TL;DR

This study uses NMR-based metabolomics to show how different soccer positions have unique metabolic responses to match demands, helping tailor recovery strategies.

## Contribution

The study introduces position-specific metabolomic signatures in professional soccer players, linking internal load with external match performance.

## Key findings

- Metabolomic analysis identified 38 key metabolites linked to carbohydrate, TCA cycle, amino acid, and energy metabolism.
- Central Midfielders showed stronger associations with muscle damage and inflammation, while Defenders and Wide Midfielders were linked to energy metabolism and oxidative stress.
- External load metrics varied significantly by position, with Central Midfielders covering more distance and Full Backs achieving higher peak speeds.

## Abstract

Background: Soccer’s varied physical demands require meticulous load monitoring, which is now being advanced by combining GPS for external metrics and NMR-based metabolomics for internal metabolic profiling. This study aimed to investigate how player position influences the metabolomic profile (as a marker of internal load) under known match effort (external load). Methods: This was a longitudinal observational descriptive study involving 12 professional soccer players from the U-20 São Paulo Football Club, enrolled in the 2022 São Paulo State Under-20 Football Championship. Players were monitored across six matches during the season, culminating in a total of 49 individual match observations from those players (4-2-3-1 formation: Central Defenders [CD], n = 9; Full Backs [FB], n = 9; Central Midfielders [CM], n = 14; Wide Midfielders [WM], n = 12; Forwards [F], n = 5). Internal load was assessed via urinary metabolomics, with urine samples collected 24 h post-match. A non-targeted, global metabolomics approach was employed using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. External load was monitored using GPS tracking devices. Multivariate analyses included partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), and heat maps. Results: Metabolomic analysis identified 38 metabolites with a Variable Importance in Projection (VIP) score > 1.0, revealing perturbations in carbohydrate metabolism and the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, amino acid and peptide metabolism, pyrimidine metabolism, and ketone body pathways, and effectively discriminating post-match recovery metabolic profiles. External load metrics varied significantly by player position: CMs covered greater distances below 20 km/h (8702.93 ± 1271.89 m), exhibited higher relative distance (114.29 ± 7.67 m/min), total distance (9193.21 ± 1261.35 m), and player load (945.71 ± 135.82 a.u.); CDs achieved higher peak speeds (31.78 ± 1.20 m/s); and WMs performed greater sprint distances (168.11 ± 91.69 m). Metabolomic profiles indicated that CMs showed stronger associations with markers of muscle damage and inflammation, whereas CDs and WMs were more closely linked to energy metabolism and oxidative stress. Conclusions: These results highlight the importance of a personalized approach to training load monitoring and recovery strategies, considering the distinct physiological and metabolic demands associated with each player position.