# A One Health Comparative Study of MDR Escherichia coli Isolated from Clinical Patients and Farm Animals in Satu Mare, Romania

## TL;DR

This study compares drug-resistant E. coli in humans and animals in Romania, finding higher resistance in animals, highlighting the need for better antimicrobial use in livestock.

## Contribution

The study provides a One Health comparison of MDR E. coli in clinical and farm animal isolates from a specific Romanian region.

## Key findings

- E. coli isolates from animals showed higher resistance to multiple antibiotics compared to human isolates.
- Multidrug resistance was observed in 79.7% of animal isolates and 70.0% of human isolates.
- Pig-derived isolates had the highest resistance burden among all animal sources.

## Abstract

Background/Objectives: Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Escherichia coli is a critical One Health challenge, with rising resistance in both humans and animals. The present study aimed to compare antimicrobial resistance (AMR) profiles of E. coli isolates from hospitalized patients and food-producing animals in Satu Mare, a county located in northwestern Romania. Methods: Between 2022–2023, 701 samples were collected, leading to 571 non-duplicate E. coli isolates (420 human, 151 animal). Human strains were recovered from 21 hospital departments and originated from feces, urine, blood, sputum, ear secretions, cerebrospinal fluid, purulent wound secretions, and puncture fluids. Animal isolates were obtained from ceca collected at local slaughterhouses serving farms in north-west Romania, including samples from turkeys, broilers, and pigs. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed against eight antimicrobials (amikacin, ampicillin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, cefepime, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim) using standardized methods. Resistance classification followed international definitions of MDR. Statistical associations between host species and resistance were assessed with chi-square tests. Results: Resistance levels were consistently higher in E. coli strains isolated from animals compared with those from humans (p < 0.05). Among human isolates, resistance to ampicillin (41.9%), ciprofloxacin (41.4%), and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (45.7%) approached, but did not exceed 50%. In contrast, E. coli strains recovered from animals showed markedly higher resistance, exceeding 50% for ampicillin (78.8%), ciprofloxacin (65.6%), and cefotaxime (55.0%). Amikacin retained full activity against all animal isolates, whereas 2.8% of human strains were resistant. Overall, multidrug resistance (MDR) was observed in 70.0% of E. coli isolates from humans and 79.7% from animals, with the highest resistance burden in pig-derived isolates. Conclusions: The study underscores the veterinary sector as a key contributor to the maintenance and spread of MDR E. coli. Even in clinically healthy animals, resistance levels exceeded those observed in human isolates. These findings emphasize the need for coordinated One Health monitoring and stricter antimicrobial use policies in livestock to reduce transmission risks across human and animal populations.