Characteristics of pediatric e-referrals through SMARC system: a two-year national analysis
Abdullah A. Alharbi, Mohammed A. Muaddi, Meshary S. Binhotan, Ahmad Y. Alqassim, Ali K. Alsultan, Mohammed S. Arafat, Abdulrahman Aldhabib, Yasser A. Alaska, Eid B. Alwahbi, Hussain A. Moafa, Gassem Gohal, Mohammed K. Alabdulaali, Nawfal A. Aljerian

TL;DR
This paper analyzes pediatric e-referrals in Saudi Arabia over two years, showing high acceptance rates and effective regional coordination.
Contribution
The study provides the first nationwide analysis of pediatric e-referral system performance in Saudi Arabia.
Findings
Routine outpatient referrals made up 56.98% of e-referrals, with high acceptance rates (91.52%) overall.
General Pediatric Care was the most common referral type, followed by Pediatric Cardiology and Neurological Diseases.
Referral numbers increased from 2023 to 2024, indicating successful system adoption.
Abstract
Electronic referral (e-referral) systems are increasingly vital for coordinating pediatric healthcare services, yet comprehensive analyses of nationwide implementation remain limited. This study examines patterns, outcomes, and system performance of pediatric e-referrals across Saudi Arabia’s healthcare network. We conducted a retrospective analysis of all pediatric e-referrals (n = 62,206) processed through the Saudi Medical Appointment and Referral Center between January 2023 and December 2024. Data analysis included referral types, subspecialty distribution, regional patterns, acceptance rates, and temporal trends. Male patients represented 54.19% of e-referrals. We found a predominance of routine outpatient referrals (56.98%), with urgent and lifesaving cases comprising 32.41%. The overall acceptance rate was 91.52%, with 100% acceptance for lifesaving cases. Internal referrals…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHealthcare Systems and Technology · Medical Research and Practices · Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
