Examining gender and ethnic disparities in scientific authorship to promote a culture of equity, diversity and inclusion at a university school of public health
Paula Christen, Julia Michalow, Tristan Naidoo, Hillary Topazian, Sabine L. van Elsland, Abeer M. Arif, Marc Baguelin, Gemma Clunie, Sarah Essilfie-Quaye, Daniela Fecht, Tini Garske, Sondus Hassounah, Jenny Husbands, Wendy Kwok, Sequoia Leuba, Clare McCormack, Kate M. Mitchell

TL;DR
This study examines gender and ethnic disparities in scientific authorship within a public health school to promote equity and inclusion.
Contribution
The study identifies persistent gender and ethnic disparities in publication rates and their amplification in senior roles.
Findings
Men published more than women across all job levels (incidence rate ratio 1.30).
The gender gap in publication rates persisted even during the COVID-19 pandemic.
White researchers had higher publication rates compared to others.
Abstract
In public health research, diverse perspectives are vital to identify biases that homogenous teams might miss. Since publication metrics influence career progression, we investigated publication rate disparities within a School of Public Health. We analysed 18 322 peer-reviewed publications by 513 affiliated researchers between 2014 and 2023 using multivariable regression models and network analysis to assess the impact of gender, ethnicity, job level and centrality in the School’s research network on publication rates. We found a persistent gender gap in publication rates across job levels and ethnicities, with men publishing more than women (incidence rate ratio 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.15–1.46). This disparity was present from early career levels and amplified in senior roles, where men were over-represented (71.2% of men at Professor level). Unadjusted analyses…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicsscientometrics and bibliometrics research · Health and Medical Research Impacts · Sex and Gender in Healthcare
