# Implementation of a patient-focused psychosocial intervention guideline for people with severe mental illness: Cluster-randomised controlled trial

**Authors:** Markus Kösters, Andreas Allgöwer, Thomas Becker, Reinhold Kilian, Uta Gühne, Steffi Riedel-Heller, Alkomiet Hasan, Peter Falkai, Klemens Ajayi, Peter Brieger, Karel Frasch, Theresa Halms, Stephan Heres, Markus Jäger, Andreas Küthmann, Albert Putzhammer, Bertram Schneeweiß, Michael Schwarz, Johanna Breilmann

PMC · DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.10126 · 2025-10-23

## TL;DR

A study tested a patient-focused guideline for psychosocial treatments in severe mental illness but found no significant boost in empowerment, though patients in the intervention group learned more about available treatments.

## Contribution

This study evaluates the real-world impact of implementing a patient-focused psychosocial intervention guideline in clinical settings.

## Key findings

- The intervention did not significantly increase patient empowerment compared to usual care.
- Patients in the intervention group showed greater knowledge of available psychosocial interventions.
- The pandemic and other factors like age and migration background may have influenced empowerment outcomes.

## Abstract

Psychosocial interventions are vital in treating severe mental illness, yet their use remains limited, and patients often lack adequate information about them. Patient-focused versions of clinical guidelines are designed to enhance mental health literacy and inform patients about available treatments, but these resources are underutilized. This study evaluated the impact of implementing a patient-focused psychosocial intervention guideline on empowerment, knowledge, and use of psychosocial interventions among individuals with severe mental illness.

Multicentre, cluster-randomised trial. The study population comprised adult patients with a severe mental disorder. The intervention group received a multimodal, structured, and protocol-led patient-focused guideline implementation, whereas the control group received treatment as usual. Data were analysed using hierarchical linear models. The primary outcome was the change in patients’ empowerment.

There was no significant intervention effect on empowerment (effect size=0.13, p=0.605), which increased slightly in both groups. The number of psychosocial interventions familiar to patients increased significantly more in the intervention group. Exploratory analyses suggest that patient empowerment could have been influenced by COVID-19-related stress, patient age, the severity of functional impairment, and migration background. The improvement in the utilisation of psychosocial interventions did not differ significantly between the intervention group (M=1.1, SD=2.5) and the control group (M=1.3, SD=2.4).

The implementation of a patient-focused psychosocial intervention guideline failed to enhance empowerment among service users. However, our analyses indicate that the intervention led to an improvement in patient knowledge with respect to guideline content. The availability of psychosocial interventions may have been significantly constrained by the COVID-19 pandemic.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** mental illness (MESH:D001523)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12646118/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12646118