# Cultural evolution in the laboratory: evolution of cooperative altruistic punishing

## TL;DR

This paper shows how cooperative and altruistic punishment behaviors can evolve in lab settings through cultural transmission and group coordination.

## Contribution

The study demonstrates the evolution of altruistic punishment in public-goods games under varying costs and transmission methods.

## Key findings

- Altruistic punishment evolved more when the cost of punishing was low.
- Cultural transmission methods influenced the evolution of cooperative behaviors.
- Group coordination improved over generations in punishing defection.

## Abstract

Culture consists of practices – behaviour patterns – shared by members of a group. Some attempts to demonstrate evolution of cultural practices in the laboratory have shown evolution of material products, such as paper aeroplanes. Some attempts have shown evolution of actual group behaviour. The present experiments demonstrated evolution of group coordination across generations in punishing defection in a public-goods game. Cost of punishing defection varied across replicates that consisted of series of groups (generations) of 10 undergraduates each. Each generation played the game anonymously for 10 rounds and could write messages to the other participants and punish defection every round. The effectiveness of punishment depended on the number of participants choosing to punish. In Experiment 1, cultural transmission from generation to generation consisted of written advice from one generation read aloud to the next generation. In Experiment 2, transmission from generation to generation consisted of having some participants return from the previous group. The cost of punishing varied across replicates: zero, one, two or five cents. In both experiments, the evolution of altruistic punishing was strongly dependent on the cost of punishing. The results add to plausibility of studying evolution of complex behaviour patterns like cooperation in the laboratory.