# Partial oxidation of methane over SSZ-39 zeolites containing iron, copper, and iron–copper mixtures with hydrogen peroxide: selective control of oxygenate formation

**Authors:** Jeewan Pokhrel, Daniel F. Shantz

PMC · DOI: 10.1039/d5ra04892c · RSC Advances · 2025-11-25

## TL;DR

This study explores using iron and copper in zeolites to selectively convert methane into methanol or formic acid using hydrogen peroxide.

## Contribution

The study introduces a new method of metal loading in zeolites to control the selectivity of methane oxidation products.

## Key findings

- Iron-exchanged SSZ-39 favors formic acid formation, while low-iron Fe, Cu-SSZ-39 favors methanol.
- A two-step metal loading method improved methanol production rates significantly.
- Fe, Cu-SSZ-39(t) was the most active catalyst, producing both methanol and formic acid efficiently.

## Abstract

Here iron and copper containing zeolites are reported for the liquid phase oxidation of methane to methanol using hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) as an oxidant. Iron-exchanged SSZ-39 favors formic acid formation while Fe, Cu-SSZ-39 samples with low iron contents shift the selectivity towards methanol with no observable formic acid formation. It was also observed that how the metals are loaded into the zeolite is integral to their catalytic performance. A two-step method wherein iron-exchanged SSZ-39 had copper added to it (Cu/Al = 0.196 and Fe/Al = 0.07) showed promising results compared to other approaches of loading both metals, resulting in a methanol production rate of 5.4 mmol (gcat−1 h−1) after one hour of reaction time. Interestingly, varying the Fe/Cu ratio of the samples enabled the possibility to increase the amount of oxygenates and shift the selectivity. The most active catalyst was Fe, Cu-SSZ-39(t) with Fe/Al = 0.212, Cu/Al = 0.031 that produced formic acid and methanol at a rate of 11.2 and 15.3 mmol (gcat−1 h−1). In general, it is observed that Fe-SSZ-39 and Fe, Cu-SSZ-39 produce more oxygenates than Fe-ZSM-5 and Fe, Cu-ZSM-5 under the same experimental conditions. Analogous to the gas phase oxidation of methane to methanol, the steric constraints of the small-pore zeolite could be one possible reason for this.

Here iron and copper containing zeolites are reported for the liquid phase oxidation of methane to methanol using hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) as an oxidant.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** methane (PubChem CID 297), methanol (PubChem CID 887), formic acid (PubChem CID 284), hydrogen peroxide (PubChem CID 784), H2O2 (PubChem CID 784)

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** methanol (MESH:D000432), Cu (MESH:D003300), zeolite (MESH:D017641), Al (MESH:D000535), H2O2 (MESH:D006861), Cu-SSZ-39 (-), Fe (MESH:D007501), methane (MESH:D008697), formic acid (MESH:C030544)
- **Cell lines:** SSZ-39 — Mus musculus (Mouse), Hybridoma (CVCL_XX77)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12645279/full.md

## Figures

11 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12645279/full.md

## References

36 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12645279/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12645279