# Clinical analysis of multiple flaps in repairing pressure injuries

**Authors:** Huwen Wu, Hanbin Deng, Jiangling Yao, Jian Yang, Rong Wang, Peishen Zhang, Han Zhou, Shaowen Cheng

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1672663 · Frontiers in Surgery · 2025-11-11

## TL;DR

This study examines how different types of surgical flaps affect the repair of severe pressure injuries and highlights the importance of individualized treatment and postoperative care.

## Contribution

The study provides clinical insights into flap selection and management for stage III and IV pressure injuries based on patient-specific factors.

## Key findings

- Fascia, musculocutaneous, and perforator flaps were used in 19, 5, and 9 cases respectively with high postoperative flap survival.
- Complications such as incisal margin necrosis and subcutaneous hematoma occurred in 4 cases but were resolved with additional treatment.
- Individualized flap selection and careful postoperative management are crucial for successful pressure injury repair.

## Abstract

Pressure injuries exhibit high prevalence and are cost-consuming in clinical treatment, and flaps are the most appropriate way for their repair, especially stage III and IV. This study was conducted to investigate the repair effects of different types of flaps and their precautions.

This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 33 patients with stage III and IV pressure injuries who were hospitalized in our department from April 2021 to December 2023. Data subjected to analysis included the location and size of pressure injuries, treatment, postoperative flap survival, complications, and wound healing after 6 months of follow-up.

Of the 33 patients involved (1 case in stage III and 32 in stage IV), there were 23 cases of sacral pressure injuries, 5 cases of ischial area, 3 cases of hip, 2 cases of back, 19 cases of fascia flaps, 5 cases of musculocutaneous flaps, 9 cases of perforator flaps, 31 cases of postoperative flaps survival, as well as 2 cases of wound healing after debridement and dressing change or re-transplantation of flaps. Furthermore, 4 cases developed complications such as incisal margin necrosis, fat liquefaction, and subcutaneous hematoma, which healed after further debridement and dressing change.

Pressure injuries of different locations, stages, and sizes should be repaired individually with different types of flaps, with emphasis required for perioperative management, as well as postoperative nursing and treatment.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** sacral pressure injuries (MESH:C537221), necrosis (MESH:D009336), hematoma (MESH:D006406), Pressure injuries (MESH:D003668)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12643977/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12643977/full.md

## References

20 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12643977/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12643977