Correction: Novel phenoxyacetic herbicides synthesized from longifolene-derived primary amine for sustainable weed management
Yanqun Huang, Pingping Lu, Hongyun Lan, Daozhan Huang, Yu Feng, Fengguo Ya, Ziqi Gao, Jiaxin Wen, Ziqiang Zhao
TL;DR
This paper corrects a previously published study on new herbicides made from longifolene-derived amines for sustainable weed control.
Contribution
The paper provides corrections to the original study's information or references.
Findings
The correction addresses errors or updates in the original publication.
It ensures accuracy in the synthesis and application of phenoxyacetic herbicides.
Abstract
Correction for ‘Novel phenoxyacetic herbicides synthesized from longifolene-derived primary amine for sustainable weed management’ by Yanqun Huang et al., RSC Adv., 2025, 15, 38251–38259, https://doi.org/10.1039/D5RA05630F.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2- —Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region10.13039/100012547
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsWeed Control and Herbicide Applications · Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies · Allelopathy and phytotoxic interactions
The authors regret that the original article contains an error in affiliation a. The correct affiliation is as displayed herein.
^ a ^School of Materials and Environment, Guangxi Minzu University, Nanning 530105.
The authors also regret an error in the Graphical Abstract of the original article. The correct version of the Graphical Abstract is shown below.
The authors also regret an error in Scheme 1 of the original article. The R_1_ substituent of compound 6c is CH_3_ instead of H. The correct reaction scheme is shown below.
Finally, the authors also regret an error in the description of the comparison of the IC_50_ value of compound 6d against Lolium multiflorum Lam. with that of GLYP-IPAM salt appearing in lines 10–11, page 38255 of the original article. The correct version is:
“The IC_50_ value of compound 6d against Lolium multiflorum Lam. root growth was higher than that of GLYP-IPAM salt, but lower than GLYP-IPAM salt against Lolium multiflorum Lam. shoot growth.”
The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.