# Safe Crestal Sinus Elevation Below 3 mm Residual Bone with Tissue-Level Implant Placement: A Case Report

## TL;DR

A new surgical technique allows dental implants in very thin bone by lifting the sinus gently, avoiding major surgery.

## Contribution

Demonstrates successful crestal sinus elevation and implant placement in less than 3 mm of residual bone using advanced tools.

## Key findings

- Implants were successfully placed with 30 Ncm insertion torque in 3.6 mm and 2.5 mm residual bone.
- Stable bone levels and successful prosthetic outcomes were maintained over three years.
- Crestal approach proved viable in anatomically challenging cases previously considered unsuitable.

## Abstract

Background and Clinical Significance: Maxillary sinus augmentation is a well-established surgical procedure for dental implant placement in the posterior maxilla when the residual alveolar bone height is insufficient. Traditionally, the lateral approach has been preferred in cases with less than 4 mm of bone; however, the crestal approach has emerged as a less invasive alternative, particularly with the advent of advanced techniques and tools such as hydraulic pressure systems and dedicated osteotomy kits. Case Presentation: This case report presents the clinical management of a 68-year-old female patient requiring rehabilitation of the right maxillary molars, where the residual bone height measured only 3.6 mm (in position 1.6) and 2.5 mm (in position 1.7). Using the CAS kit system with rounded drills and hydraulic pressure, a controlled crestal sinus elevation was performed, followed by simultaneous implant placement. Despite the extremely limited bone height, a final insertion torque of 30 Ncm was achieved for both implants, likely due to favorable sinus floor anatomy, under-preparation of the implant sites, and the use of tapered, macro-textured implants. Postoperative follow-up over three years showed stable bone levels and successful prosthetic rehabilitation with single crowns. Conclusions: This case report highlights the potential of the crestal approach in anatomically challenging scenarios. Proper planning, technique, and implant selection are mandatory to achieve predictable and long-lasting outcomes, even in cases previously considered contraindicated for this method. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm this preliminary result.