# From Technical Pitfall to Clinical Consequences: Leadless Pacing as a Rescue Solution

## TL;DR

This case study shows how leadless pacing can be a safe solution when traditional pacemakers fail due to complications like stroke and venous occlusion.

## Contribution

The paper presents a novel clinical application of leadless pacing as a rescue strategy in complex, high-risk scenarios.

## Key findings

- Leadless pacing was successfully used in a patient with early pacemaker failure and venous occlusion.
- Device interrogation helped identify lead insulation failure and battery depletion as causes of malfunction.
- The patient showed favorable neurological recovery after the leadless pacemaker was implanted.

## Abstract

Background and Clinical Significance: Early lead failure after dual-chamber pacemaker implantation is rare but clinically significant, particularly when associated with thromboembolic complications. Technical pitfalls at the time of implantation, such as suture fixation without protective sleeves, may be predisposed to premature lead damage and abrupt device malfunction. This case highlights the role of device interrogation in diagnosing arrhythmia-related stroke, the challenges of reimplantation in the setting of venous occlusion and anticoagulation, and the value of leadless pacing as a safe rescue strategy. Case Presentation: A 78-year-old man with a history of complete atrioventricular block underwent dual-chamber pacemaker implantation one year earlier. He presented to the emergency department with acute aphasia, right-sided hemiparesis, and facial asymmetry. Stroke was diagnosed, and new-onset atrial fibrillation was documented. Device interrogation revealed an abrupt fall in lead impedance followed by a sharp rise consistent with lead insulation failure and premature battery depletion. Fluoroscopy demonstrated multiple focal narrowings of the leads and complete left subclavian vein occlusion, making conventional transvenous reimplantation unfeasible, while extraction was judged high risk. Right-sided reimplantation was avoided due to hemorrhagic risk under anticoagulation. A leadless pacemaker was implanted successfully in the apico-septal region of the right ventricle via ultrasound-guided femoral access. Hemostasis was secured with a figure-of-8 suture fixed inside a 3-way tap, providing constant compression and preventing hematoma. At two-months follow-up, device function was stable and neurological recovery was favorable (mRS = 2). Conclusions: This case underscores how multiple adverse factors—stroke, arrhythmia detection, early device failure, venous occlusion, and anticoagulation—may converge in a single patient, and demonstrates leadless pacing as a safe and effective rescue strategy in such complex scenarios.