Regarding “osteoporosis screening and major osteoporotic fracture prediction by cranial computed tomography-derived hounsfield units: a multi-center study on opportunistic osteoporosis screening”
Renzhong Li, Kui Sun, Junchen Zhu

Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
- —National TCM Advantageous Specialties
- —Special Funds Project for Inheritance and Development of Traditional Chinese Medicine Undertakings of the Central Finance Government (State Chinese Medicine Medical Policy Letter
- —Natural Science Research Program for Universities in Anhui Province
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBone health and osteoporosis research · Bone Metabolism and Diseases · Dental Radiography and Imaging
Dear Editor
The study by Wakolbinger-Habel et al. provides meaningful evidence that cranial CT-derived Hounsfield units (HU) can be used as an opportunistic marker for osteoporosis screening [1]. This multi-center work contributes valuable data on the relationship between cranial bone density and systemic bone mineral status, highlighting the potential of existing cranial CT scans to identify patients at risk of osteoporotic fractures. Nevertheless, several aspects deserve further discussion to strengthen the reproducibility and clinical interpretability of the results.
Because data were acquired from multiple Siemens CT platforms with heterogeneous reconstruction kernels and slice thicknesses, potential scanner-specific HU bias cannot be excluded. Even modest differences in reconstruction algorithms or dose modulation can lead to notable variability in measured HU, which may shift diagnostic thresholds. Future investigations could employ phantom-based or water-equivalent calibration and apply harmonization methods such as ComBat correction to minimize inter-scanner variability. Additionally, stratified analysis by scanner model or reconstruction parameters would clarify the robustness of the proposed 606 HU cutoff across different imaging systems [2].
The study’s threshold derivation relied exclusively on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) categories. While DXA remains the standard diagnostic reference, it does not fully capture fracture risk. Since the majority of the cohort had a history of major osteoporotic fracture, recalibrating HU thresholds based on fracture outcomes could improve their clinical relevance. Logistic or survival models using major osteoporotic fractures as endpoints would help determine whether HU predicts fractures independently of DXA, and whether integrating HU into established risk models such as FRAX adds incremental value for clinical decision-making [3].
From an integrative medicine perspective, incorporating functional assessments may further refine cranial HU-based fracture risk prediction. Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) emphasizes the interconnection between muscle strength, postural stability, and bone health in its orthopedic and rehabilitation Practice [4]. Evidence demonstrates that TCM-based multimodal interventions—including Tai Chi exercise, acupuncture, and herbal therapies—can improve bone mineral density, enhance muscle endurance, and reduce fracture risk in osteoporotic patients [5]. Future studies tracking HU changes following such interventions could help establish HU as a dynamic biomarker reflecting both structural and functional bone quality.
In summary, this study establishes an important foundation for opportunistic osteoporosis detection using cranial CT. Building on this work, future research should focus on scanner harmonization, outcome-based validation, and the integration of functional and complementary-medicine perspectives. Such refinements would help transition cranial HU from a purely diagnostic parameter to a practical indicator guiding personalized bone health management and early fracture prevention.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Wakolbinger-Habel R, Bittner-Frank M, Desch S, et al. Osteoporosis screening and major osteoporotic fracture prediction by cranial computed tomography-derived Hounsfield units: a multi-center study on opportunistic osteoporosis screening. Ann Med. 2025;57(1):2554930. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2554930.40908863 PMC 12416018 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Dudle A, Ith M, Egli R, et al. Asynchronous calibration of a CT scanner for bone mineral density estimation: sources of error and correction. JBMR Plus. 2024;8(9):ziae 096. doi: 10.1093/jbmrpl/ziae 096.39183821 PMC 11344033 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Andresen JR, Schröder G, Haider T, et al. Osteoporosis assessment using bone density measurement in hounsfield units in the femoral native CT cross-section: a comparison with computed tomography X-ray absorptiometry of the hip. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025;15(8):1014. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics 15081014.40310424 PMC 12025547 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Cao G, Hu S, Ning Y, et al. Traditional Chinese medicine in osteoporosis: from pathogenesis to potential activity. Front Pharmacol. 2024;15:1370900. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1370900.38628648 PMC 11019011 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Li J, Guo J, Wang X, et al. Efficacy and safety of tai chi exercise on bone health: An umbrella review. Osteoporos Int. 2023;34(11):1853–1866. doi: 10.1007/s 00198-023-06830-7.37430003 PMC 10579121 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
