# Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model for Prediction of Immunoglobulins Exposure in Pregnant Women

## TL;DR

This study developed a model to predict how immunoglobulins behave in pregnant women, showing that bodyweight-based dosing works well.

## Contribution

A minimal PBPK model incorporating pregnancy-specific physiology for predicting immunoglobulin exposure in pregnant women.

## Key findings

- The model predicted IVIG and anti-D Ig concentrations with average fold errors of 1.17 and 1.22, respectively.
- Bodyweight-based dosing resulted in minimal changes in IVIG exposure during pregnancy compared to flat dosing.
- Third-trimester pregnant subjects had 15% lower Cmax and 8% lower Ctrough for IVIG compared to nonpregnant subjects.

## Abstract

Background: Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling is applied to address clinical pharmacology issues including dose selection and exposure assessments for special populations (e.g., pediatrics, and renally or hepatically impaired patients). The objective of this study was to evaluate the predictive performance of a PBPK model for dosing assessment of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and anti-D immunoglobulin (anti-D Ig) products in pregnant women. Methods: A minimal PBPK (mPBPK) model that incorporates pregnancy-specific physiological parameters and allometric scaling approaches was developed and evaluated for predicting the exposure of IVIG and anti-D Ig in pregnant women. The concentration versus time data were obtained from the published literature. Results: The IVIG (n = 22) and anti-D Ig (n = 29) concentrations were predicted using the mPBPK model with an average fold error of 1.17 and 1.22, respectively. A total of 100% and 95% of IVIG concentrations were predicted within the 0.5–2-fold and 0.5–1.5-fold prediction error ranges, respectively. For anti-D Ig, predictions fell within the 0.5–2-fold and 0.5–1.5-fold ranges for 93% and 76% concentrations, respectively. A mPBPK model-based simulation following administration of 0.5 g/kg IVIG in 100 virtual nonpregnant and pregnant subjects revealed that the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) was 15% lower and trough concentration (Ctrough) was 8% lower during the third trimester of pregnancy compared to nonpregnant subjects. In contrast, with flat dosing, Cmax and Ctrough were 32% and 26% lower in pregnant subjects, respectively. Overall, the model demonstrated reasonable predictive performance, and bodyweight-based dosing regimen is an acceptable approach that results in minimal change in exposure of IVIG in pregnant women.