# Systemic Sclerosis in Kazakh Patients: A Preliminary Case–Control Immunogenetic Profiling Study

## TL;DR

This study explores the genetic and immune factors linked to systemic sclerosis in Kazakh patients, identifying new genetic variants and immune markers.

## Contribution

The first immunogenetic profiling of systemic sclerosis in a Kazakh cohort, revealing novel genetic variants and immune markers.

## Key findings

- SSc patients showed a broad range of autoantibodies not found in healthy controls.
- Multiple genetic variants in immune regulatory genes were identified, including likely pathogenic changes.
- Novel variants in LY96, PTPN22, IRAK1, and SAMD9L were found and not previously reported in SSc.

## Abstract

Background/Objectives: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a heterogeneous connective tissue disease characterized by immune dysregulation, vasculopathy, and fibrosis. Objectives: To evaluate the genetic architecture and autoantibody profile in a Kazakh cohort of patients with SSc. Methods: A total of 26 Kazakh patients with diffuse SSc were examined for disease activity and organ impairment using EScSG and the modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS). Eighteen healthy volunteers were enrolled in the control group. Antinuclear factor (ANF) was estimated on HEp-2 cells, while antibodies to Scl-70, CENP-B, U1-snRNP, SS-A/Ro52, SS-A/Ro60, Sm/RNP, Sm, SS-B, Rib-P0, and nucleosomes were determined by immunoblotting. The level of IL-6 cytokine was detected using ELISA. To investigate the genetic basis of SSc in Kazakh patients, a custom AmpliSeq panel including targeting immune/fibrosis pathways and 120 genes was used on the Ion Proton sequencer. The statistical analysis of categorical variables was conducted using Fisher’s exact test and Chi-square (χ2) test. Results: The examination of SSc patients (mRSS 16 ± 7.2; EScSG 3.54 ± 2.18) revealed a broad range of antibodies to Scl-70, CENP-B, SS-A/Ro60, SS-A/Ro52, U1-snRNP, and RNP/Sm, which were undetectable in the control group. Genetic analysis identified multiple variants across immune regulatory genes, including likely pathogenic changes in SAMD9L, REL, IL6ST, TNFAIP3, ITGA2, ABCC2, AIRE, IL6R, AFF3, and TREX1. Variants of uncertain clinical significance were detected in LY96, IRAK1, RBPJ, IL6ST, ITGA2, AIRE, IL6R, JAZF1, IKZF3, IL18, IL12B, PRKCQ, PXK, and DNASE1L3. Novel variants at the following genomic coordinates were identified and have not been previously reported in association with SSc: LY96 (chr8:74922341 CT/C), PTPN22 (chr1:114381166 CT/C), IRAK1 (indels at chrX:153278833), and SAMD9L (chr7:92761606 GT/G; chr7:92764981 T/TT). Conclusions: The first immunogenetic investigation of SSc in Kazakhstan revealed a polygenic architecture involving immune signalling pathways that partially overlap with international cohorts while exhibiting region-specific variation. Although the limited sample size and lack of functional validation constrain the interpretability of the findings, the results provide a framework for larger research to confirm the pathogenic mechanisms and establish clinical relevance.