# Comparison of endovascular therapy care and outcome in primary and comprehensive stroke centers for acute ischemic stroke in China a real-world nationwide registry

**Authors:** Ting-yu Yi, Shujuan Gan, Meihua Wu, Weifeng Huang, Yanmin Wu, Hanming Tu, Changjun Yang, Lihua Xu, Hui Tan, Lin Gao, Shuguang Zhao, Linping Wei, Yingchun Wu, Guiguan Yang, Jian Ye, Dongsheng Ju, Ya Shao, Zaihui Zhang, Junfeng Su, Shijun Zhao, Weidong Huang, Xinshan Wu, Dinglai Lin, Xiaohui Lin, ZhiNan Pan, Xiufen Zheng, Ganji Hong, Rongcheng Chen, Lisan Zeng, Thanh N. Nguyen, Xuesong Bai, Liqun Jiao, Wen-huo Chen

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1655954 · Frontiers in Neurology · 2025-11-10

## TL;DR

This study compares stroke treatment outcomes between primary and comprehensive stroke centers in China, finding lower success rates and higher mortality in primary centers.

## Contribution

The study provides real-world data on endovascular therapy performance in Chinese stroke centers, highlighting workflow and outcome disparities.

## Key findings

- PSCs had shorter onset-to-presentation times but longer door-to-puncture times compared to CSCs.
- Successful reperfusion rates were lower in PSCs, and mortality was higher despite shorter arrival times.
- Good clinical outcomes were similar between PSCs and CSCs despite workflow differences.

## Abstract

Endovascular treatment (EVT) is a standard therapy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by large vessel occlusion (LVO). However, the performance of EVT in primary stroke centers (PSCs) in China remains uncertain. This study aims to explore the performance of EVT in PSCs and compare it with that in comprehensive stroke centers (CSCs).

We conducted a prospective registry of EVT at 11 CSCs and 26 PSCs in China. AIS patients with intracranial LVO who received EVT were divided into two groups based on the type of stroke center. We compared the AIS workflow, EVT procedural details, radiological, and clinical outcomes between the two groups.

From November 2021 to December 2022, 1,196 patients were enrolled, and 847 were included in the analysis. Overall, 84.8% of patients achieved successful reperfusion, and 46.3% achieved good clinical outcomes. Compared with patients treated at CSCs, those treated at PSCs had shorter onset-to-presentation time (OPT: 152 min vs. 268 min, p < 0.001) but longer door-to-puncture time (DPT: 112 min vs. 95 min, p < 0.001). Successful reperfusion rates were lower in PSCs (76.6% vs. 91.0%, p < 0.001), and mortality was higher (24.7% vs. 14.4%, p < 0.001). However, good clinical outcomes were similar between the two groups (44.3% vs. 47.8%, p = 0.309).

In China, successful reperfusion rates were lower and mortality rates were higher despite shorter onset-to-presentation times in primary stroke centers. Additionally, door-to-puncture times were prolonged despite limited use of advanced brain imaging. These findings highlight the need for EVT skill training and improvement in the AIS workflow in primary stroke centers to enhance patient outcomes.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** stroke (MESH:D020521), LVO (MESH:C536223), AIS (MESH:D000083242)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12641255/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12641255/full.md

## References

45 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12641255/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12641255