# Postoperative pain outcomes following uniportal vs. multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

**Authors:** Fahim Kanani, Alaa Zahalka, Moshe Kamar, Rijini Nugzar, Ory Wiesel, Yael Refaely, Anas Salhab, Mordechai Shimonov, Diego Gonzalez-Rivas, Firas Abu Akar

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1689456 · Frontiers in Surgery · 2025-11-10

## TL;DR

Uniportal VATS reduces postoperative pain more than multiportal VATS for lung surgeries, with benefits lasting up to seven days.

## Contribution

This study provides the first systematic review and meta-analysis comparing true uniportal VATS with multiportal VATS under strict criteria.

## Key findings

- Uniportal VATS reduced 24-hour pain intensity by 2.5 points on a 10-point scale.
- Opioid consumption decreased by 10.6 mg of morphine equivalents with uniportal VATS.
- Pain benefits persisted at 48 hours and seven days post-surgery.

## Abstract

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has evolved from multiportal to uniportal approaches, theoretically offering reduced postoperative pain through single intercostal space access. However, inconsistent surgical definitions and mixed evidence have limited clinical guidance.

To systematically evaluate postoperative pain outcomes between true uniportal VATS (strictly defined by the 2019 European Society of Thoracic Surgeons criteria) and multiportal VATS for lung resections.

We searched five databases during the period between January 2000 and January 2025 for comparative studies of uniportal vs. multiportal VATS reporting pain outcomes. True uniportal VATS requires a single intercostal incision (2.5–5 cm) with all instruments through one port. Meta-analyses were excluded to prevent data duplication. The primary outcome was 24-h pain intensity. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to calculate standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (ROB 2) randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the risk-of-bias in non-randomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) for observational studies.

Nineteen studies (6 RCTs, 13 observational) comprising 2,544 patients (1,156 uniportal, 1,388 multiportal) met the inclusion criteria. Uniportal VATS significantly reduced pain at 24 h (SMD −0.98, 95% CI −1.12 to −0.84, p < 0.0001), equating to a reduction of 2.5 points on a 10-point scale. Benefits persisted at 48 h (SMD −0.80) and 7 days (SMD −0.58). Opioid consumption decreased by 10.6 mg of morphine equivalents (95% CI −14.8 to −6.4). Heterogeneity was moderate (I2 = 63.6%). Studies using standardized analgesia protocols showed larger effects (SMD −1.05) with lower heterogeneity (I2 = 58.4%). Meta-regression identified a decrease in effect sizes over time (β = 0.05 per year, p = 0.024). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results, with all iterations maintaining statistical significance.

True uniportal VATS provides clinically meaningful reductions in postoperative pain compared with multiportal approaches when applying strict anatomical criteria. Benefits are enhanced with standardized perioperative analgesia protocols. Implementation should consider local expertise and the observed heterogeneity in treatment effects.

Not prospectively registered; PRISMA 2020 guidelines followed.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Postoperative pain (MESH:D010149), pain (MESH:D010146)
- **Chemicals:** morphine (MESH:D009020)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12641003/full.md

## Figures

10 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12641003/full.md

## References

63 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12641003/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12641003