# Cross‐Sectional Survey on Mediastinal Lymph Node Dissection in Lung and Esophageal Cancer: A Project of the Anatomy of the Border Consensus Meeting at the 37th Annual Meeting of the Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery

**Authors:** Kentaro Miura, Koji Shindo, Yukihiro Terada, Toshiya Abe, Kenoki Ohuchida, Koichi Suda, Mingyon Mun, Kazutaka Obama, Masato Watanabe, Hisashi Iwata, Hisashi Shinohara, Ichiro Uyama, Hirokazu Noshiro, Norihiko Ikeda, Masafumi Nakamura, Yuko Kitagawa, Kimihiro Shimizu

PMC · DOI: 10.1111/ases.70187 · Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery · 2025-11-23

## TL;DR

This study highlights differences in mediastinal lymph node dissection practices between lung and esophageal cancer surgeries in Japan, showing a lack of standardized consensus.

## Contribution

The paper presents a nationwide survey revealing conceptual and procedural discrepancies in lymph node dissection practices between two surgical fields.

## Key findings

- Esophageal cancer institutions routinely perform lymph node dissection, while lung cancer practices vary widely.
- The concept of 'sampling' is more accepted in lung surgery than in esophageal surgery.
- There is no uniform definition of 'en bloc dissection' across either field.

## Abstract

Although mediastinal lymph node dissection is performed in both lung and esophageal cancer surgeries, the underlying concepts and indications may differ between these fields. This study aimed to clarify these differences through a nationwide questionnaire survey initiated by the 37th Annual Meeting of the Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery.

A joint task force from the lung and esophageal surgery divisions developed a questionnaire focusing on four key areas: (i) lymph node dissection around the left recurrent nerve, (ii) subcarinal lymph node dissection, (iii) pulmonary ligament lymph node dissection, and (iv) en bloc lymph node dissection. The survey was distributed to certified core institutions across Japan.

The response rates were 50.4% for lung cancer institutions and 57.0% for esophageal cancer institutions. In the esophageal division, dissection of the aforementioned lymph nodes was routinely performed in most core institutions. In contrast, practices in the lung division varied widely, particularly depending on tumor location. The concept of “sampling” was rarely recognized in esophageal surgery but was partially accepted in lung surgery. Furthermore, there was no uniform definition of “en bloc dissection” across either field.

This cross‐sectional survey revealed notable conceptual differences between lung and esophageal cancer divisions regarding mediastinal lymph node dissection, despite targeting the same anatomical regions. Additionally, significant variability was observed even within the lung division. These findings indicate a lack of standardized consensus in Japan and highlight the need for ongoing cross‐disciplinary dialog and consensus building.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** lung cancer (MONDO:0005138), esophageal cancer (MONDO:0007576)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** esophageal cancer (MESH:D004938), tumor (MESH:D009369), lung (MESH:D008171), Lung and Esophageal Cancer (MESH:D008175)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12640797/full.md

## Figures

7 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12640797/full.md

## References

22 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12640797/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12640797