# Analysis of online information about success rates in fertility clinics in Spain. An urgent call for public health action

**Authors:** Anna De Bayas Sanchez, Virginie Rozée, Manon Vialle, Kristien Hens, Joke Stryuf, Willem Ombelet, María Rosa Tapia Sánchez, Marta María Albert Márquez, Juana Farfán Montero, José Miguel Carrasco, Michaela Fuller, Vera Dimitrievska, Jana Melosca, Nathaniel Barrett, Francisco Güell Pelayo, Athanasios Papathanasiou, Anna De Bayas Sanchez, Karin Hammarberg, Anna De Bayas Sanchez

PMC · DOI: 10.12688/openreseurope.20090.1 · Open Research Europe · 2025-06-09

## TL;DR

Fertility clinics in Spain often mislead patients with unclear or exaggerated success rate information, calling for stronger regulation and transparency.

## Contribution

The paper identifies misleading practices in fertility clinic success rate reporting and proposes legal and regulatory solutions.

## Key findings

- Clinics frequently use vague or unverified success rate data without clear definitions or sources.
- Age-specific and treatment-specific success rates are often omitted, leading to misleading general claims.
- The paper recommends legal and regulatory actions to improve transparency and consumer protection.

## Abstract

The medically assisted reproduction (MAR) industry is a booming sector of the economy, and Spain is proving to be a notable example of this industry's rise. Marketing strategies in the healthcare sector are shaped by the constant tension between providing clear, complete and appropriate information about treatments and providing information to attract and retain customers.

We conducted a systematic analysis of success rate information published on the websites of Spain’s five most representative MAR clinics as of November 2023. The analysis examined terminology, certifications and audits by external bodies, references to data sources, age-specific success rates, and generalised claims about treatment effectiveness.

We identified significant deficiencies and ambiguities in how clinics present success rate data. Common issues included vague definitions, lack of certification details, absence of reliable data sources, and failure to differentiate outcomes by age or treatment type. Several clinics used overly optimistic or potentially misleading statistics, making it difficult for patients to assess their realistic chances of success. We provide legal recommendations to strengthen consumer protection and regulate advertising practices. We also emphasise that presenting clear and truthful success rate information is not only a legal requirement but also an ethical duty in reproductive healthcare.

Stronger regulation of success rate reporting in Spain’s fertility sector is urgently needed. We recommend that external authorities oversee and standardise data reporting to ensure transparency and prevent misleading practices. A centralised public body should be responsible for monitoring, collecting, and managing this data to protect patient rights and improve trust in fertility care.

## Full-text entities

- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12640485/full.md

## References

23 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12640485/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12640485