# Augmented Reality in Outpatient Care: A Narrative Review

**Authors:** Archan Khandekar, Aryan Shah, Luis A. Esparza Miranda, Frida Toscano Bello, Bruno Liebl, Jonathan Ryan, Pedro Angelo Basei de Paula, Ansh Bhatia, Timothy Guerard, Dipen J. Parekh

PMC · DOI: 10.1049/htl2.70025 · Healthcare Technology Letters · 2025-11-22

## TL;DR

This review explores how augmented reality can improve outpatient care by enhancing patient understanding, engagement, and procedural support, while identifying challenges like hardware limitations.

## Contribution

The paper categorizes AR applications in outpatient care into five clinical domains and highlights the need for integration into clinical workflows.

## Key findings

- AR improves patient understanding, engagement, and procedural accuracy in outpatient settings.
- Most AR studies in outpatient care are small-scale pilot studies with limited sample sizes.
- Technical challenges like hardware complexity and platform inconsistencies hinder AR adoption.

## Abstract

Augmented reality (AR) is seeing an increase in its applications in healthcare, but its reach in outpatient care remains undefined. Patients in outpatient settings face poor medical understanding. AR may help address this gap between patients and physicians through immersive and interactive models and supporting tools. This narrative review aims to evaluate the status of AR in outpatient care, categorise its applications, and identify limitations and future research needs.

Four databases–PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library–were conducted for peer‐reviewed studies published from January 2015 to February 2025. Studies were included if they regarded AR interventions in outpatient care settings. Studies were analysed and grouped thematically into five clinical domains of AR intervention.

After review, 19 studies–spanning 987 participants–were included. AR applications were categorised into patient education and engagement (n = 3), cognitive and functional assessment (n = 3), device interaction and remote monitoring (n = 3), procedural guidance in outpatient interventions (n = 5), and rehabilitation and functional recovery support (n = 5). Most included studies were pilot studies (n = 6) and had relatively small sample sizes (median = 28). Studies proved that AR interventions consistently improved patient understanding, engagement and procedural support. Nevertheless, studies faced limitations including the need for specialised and bulky hardware–which affected patient comfort as well–reliability issues, technical difficulties and platform‐specific inconsistencies.

AR has been proved to have the potential to improve outpatient care across five main areas: patient education, cognitive and functional assessment, medical device interaction, procedural guidance and rehabilitation. Studies consistently support that AR enhances patient comprehension, engagement and procedural accuracy while allowing for remote monitoring and personalised therapy. Furthermore, AR interventions demonstrate high usability and clinical relevance. Nevertheless, limitations such as hardware complexity and inconsistent technical performance remain. Future research should prioritise large‐scale RCTs and strategies to integrate AR into pre‐existing digital workflows.

Augmented Reality (AR) is increasingly used in healthcare, but its role in outpatient care is not well defined. This review of 19 studies found that AR, in outpatient settings, assists in patient education and engagement, cognitive and functional assessment, remote monitoring, outpatient procedures and rehablilitation. Future research should focus on integrating AR into clinical workflows and conducting larger‐scale trials to address hardware and reliability challenges.

## Full-text entities

- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12640284/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12640284/full.md

## References

27 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12640284/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12640284