# Measures of the psychophysiological response to recurrent anticipatory stress - the influence of neuroticism on heart rhythm and skin resistance

**Authors:** Florestan Wagenblast, Robert Seibt, Monika A. Rieger, Benjamin Steinhilber

PMC · DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-28090-7 · Scientific Reports · 2025-11-21

## TL;DR

The study explores how heart rhythm and skin resistance respond to repeated stress in people with different levels of neuroticism.

## Contribution

It identifies which psychophysiological measures are most reliable for detecting recurrent anticipatory stress.

## Key findings

- Skin resistance and low-frequency HRV showed similar responses under both electric shock conditions.
- Heart rate increased in the first electric shock condition only for the higher neuroticism group.
- Some HRV parameters did not respond to the stressor, suggesting they may not be reliable indicators.

## Abstract

In the risk assessment of work-related mental stress, the use of objective psychophysiological methods could improve the identification of mental stressors. However, mental stressors often reoccur during work, and adaptation processes and individual factors may alter psychophysiological responses over time. In this exploratory study, measures of heart rhythm and skin resistance during recurrent anticipatory stress were examined in two groups with lower and higher neuroticism to provide information on which method is most appropriate for stress detection. In the with-in subject design study participants were required to first anticipate a neutral audio signal during a control condition and then a potential painful electric shock in two subsequent experimental conditions. Heart rate (HR), heart rate variability (HRV), and skin resistance (SR) parameters were extracted during anticipation. Groups with lower and higher neuroticism were formed based on the Big Five Inventory. While SR parameters and the low-frequency HRV responded similarly under both electric shock conditions, the root mean square of successive time differences between heartbeats, and the high-frequency HRV did not respond. HR increased in the 1st electric shock condition in the higher neuroticism group only. Parameters that responded under both electric shock conditions may contribute to more accurately mapping of recurrent anticipatory stressors.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-025-28090-7.

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** SRL (sarcalumenin) [NCBI Gene 6345] {aka SAR}
- **Diseases:** depression (MESH:D003866), injury (MESH:D014947), musculoskeletal, mental and behavioral disorders (MESH:D009139), cardiovascular diseases (MESH:D002318), pain (MESH:D010146), EDA (OMIM:612348), heart problems (MESH:D006331), mental strain (MESH:D013180), inability to (MESH:C564980), Mental tension (MESH:D018781), neurological, psychological, or metabolic diseases (MESH:D001928)
- **Chemicals:** caffeine (MESH:D002110), Ag (MESH:D012834), alcohol (MESH:D000438), cortisol (MESH:D006854), DIN EN ISO 10075 (-), AgCl (MESH:C037548)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12638765/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12638765/full.md

## References

11 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12638765/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12638765