This paper is marked retracted in the scholarly record (OpenAlex). Interpret its findings with caution.
RETRACTION: Evaluation of Wound‐Healing Activity of Hydrogel Extract of Sansevieria trifasciata Leaves (Asparagaceae)
Advances in Pharmacological and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsWound Healing and Treatments · Phytochemical Studies and Bioactivities · Antioxidants, Aging, Portulaca oleracea
RETRACTION: N. Yuniarsih, H. Hidayah, N. S. Gunarti, et al., “Evaluation of Wound‐Healing Activity of Hydrogel Extract of Sansevieria trifasciata Leaves (Asparagaceae),” Advances in Pharmacological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7680518.
The above article, published online on 29 August 2023 in Wiley Online Library (https://wileyonlinelibrary.com), has been retracted by agreement between the journal Editor‐in‐Chief, Kim Wei Chan, and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. The retraction has been agreed due to multiple concerns with Figure 5, which were initially raised on PubPeer [1]. Specifically,
- •The 4 days/NC panel and the 2 days/15% HESt panel appear similar.
- •The following panels appear similar:
- ◦8 days 15% HESt panel
- ◦8 days 25% HESt panel
- ◦16 days NC panel
- •At 16 days, the 20% HESt and 25% HESt panels appear similar.
- •At 0 days, the PC and 20% HESt appear similar if rotated 90°.
Additionally, on further assessment by the Editorial Board, inconsistencies with the methodology were identified. Specifically,
- •The extract was initially prepared using 96% ethanol, but the extract used for HPLC quantification was obtained through a completely different solvent system (70% methanol) and extraction procedure.
- •The HPLC chromatogram provided appears to lack proper methodological optimisation prior to quantification.
The authors were asked to respond to the concerns with the figures, however could not provide the raw data and original images.
The authors disagree with the retraction.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.