# Mapping the Conflict Between Oral Health and Patient Autonomy in Dentistry: A Unified Qualitative-Quantitative Study

**Authors:** Szilárd Dávid Kovács, Anna Jeney, Szilvia Zörgő

PMC · DOI: 10.1016/j.identj.2025.104012 · International Dental Journal · 2025-11-06

## TL;DR

This study explores the ethical conflict between medical advice and patient autonomy in dentistry by analyzing perspectives from both dentists and patients.

## Contribution

The study introduces a novel approach combining qualitative and quantitative methods to map ethical dilemmas in dental care.

## Key findings

- Dentists prefer esthetic procedures with medical justification but emphasize patient decision-making.
- Patients often link esthetics to health and rely on personal experiences for treatment choices.
- Existing ethical theories fail to fully capture the complexity of patient reasoning.

## Abstract

Patients’ interests encompass both medical indication and their autonomous requests; however, these two aspects often conflict. We aimed to map this ethical dilemma considering dentists’ and patients’ perspectives.

We included patient and dentist subsamples, applying quotas for sex and leadership experience among dentists, and quotas for sex and age among patients. We conducted semi-structured interviews, developed codes using prior theory, and inspected the coded dataset using Epistemic Network Analysis, a method that visualizes code co-occurrence patterns.

Dentists’ narratives indicated a preference for performing esthetic procedures that also had a medical indication; albeit, they encouraged patients to make treatment decisions by informing adequately. Patients often justified esthetic procedures by associating esthetics with health, while in other cases, they based decisions on prior experiences and perceived comfort.

Ethical theory adopted from literature was insufficient to fully capture complexities, particularly in-patient narratives. These findings indicate a need for novel ethical approaches that better reflect patients’ reasoning.

If individual dentists or higher-level stakeholders advocate for change, they must account for patient’s subjective perspectives and lived experiences.

## Full-text entities

- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12637382/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12637382/full.md

## References

27 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12637382/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12637382