# APOE Genotype Differentially Modulates Prion Pathology in a Mouse Model

**Authors:** Anita M. Lizińczyk, Joanna E. Pankiewicz, William L. Cullina, Leor A. Franco, Patrick M. Sullivan, Martin J. Sadowski

PMC · DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7820890/v1 · Research Square · 2025-10-30

## TL;DR

This study shows that different APOE gene variants affect how prion diseases progress in mice, with the ε4 variant causing the worst outcomes.

## Contribution

The study reveals that APOE genotype differentially modulates prion disease progression through ε4-driven mechanisms of PrPSc accumulation and neuroinflammation.

## Key findings

- ε4/ε4 mice showed the shortest disease latency, worst neurological scores, and highest spongiform lesions.
- APOE ε4 increases PrPSc accumulation, reduces solubility, and enhances neuroinflammation compared to ε3.
- ε2 also worsens disease outcomes compared to ε3, though less severely than ε4.

## Abstract

APOE polymorphism affects the risk of occurrence and the rate of progression in several neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer’s disease, primary tauopathies, α-synucleinopathy, and age-related macular degeneration, but its role in prionoses remains unestablished. Using APOE targeted replacement (TR) mice, we investigated how APOE genotype affects key neurodegenerative mechanisms involved in prion pathology. Male and female ε2/ε2, ε3/ε3, and ε4/ε4 APOE-TR mice were inoculated with 22L mouse-adapted scrapie strain or normal brain homogenate and monitored with behavioral testing from 10-week post inoculation (wpi.) onward. Mice were euthanized at 23 wpi. when all prion-infected animals were symptomatic, and their brains were analyzed for multiple neuropathological, biochemical, and transcriptomic metrics. ε4/ε422L mice featured the shortest disease latency time, the worst neurological score, and the highest load of spongiform lesions. ε2/ε222L mice performed significantly better than ε4/ε422L mice but significantly worse than ε3/ε322L animals. Numerous aspects of PrP proteinopathy were exacerbated in the presence of the ε4 allele including increased PrPSc accumulation, reduced PrP solubility, and increased PrP oligomerization. These metrics were comparable between ε2/ε222L and ε3/ε322L mice. Prion pathology significantly increased brain apolipoprotein (apo) E levels, with the greatest increase in ε4/ε422L mice. All apoE isoforms formed complexes with conformationally altered PrP, but this interaction was the strongest in ε4/ε422L mice. ε4/ε422L mice had the highest load of reactive microglia and astrocytes and upregulation of transcriptomic markers typical of neurodegenerative microglia and astrocytes, followed by ε2/ε222L, with ε3/ε322L having the lowest. Thus, APOE polymorphism differentially regulates the progression of prion pathology attributable to two ε4-affected mechanisms: increased conversion and accumulation of PrPSc and worsened prion-associated neuroinflammation. Though less severely than ε4, the ε2 allele also increased the inflammatory response, rendering disease outcome worse relative to the ε3 allele. Our findings suggest both ε4 and ε2 alleles are disadvantageous determinants in prion pathology.

## Linked entities

- **Genes:** APOE (apolipoprotein E) [NCBI Gene 348]
- **Proteins:** Prnp (prion protein)
- **Diseases:** Alzheimer’s disease (MONDO:0004975), age-related macular degeneration (MONDO:0005150)
- **Species:** Mus musculus (taxon 10090)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** Prnp (prion protein) [NCBI Gene 19122] {aka CD230, PrP, PrP<C>, PrPC, PrPSc, Prn-i}
- **Diseases:** primary tauopathies (MESH:D024801), neurodegenerative diseases (MESH:D019636), neuroinflammation (MESH:D000090862), proteinopathy (MESH:D057165), inflammatory (MESH:D007249), age-related macular degeneration (MESH:D008268), alpha-synucleinopathy (MESH:D000080874), infected (MESH:D007239), Alzheimer's disease (MESH:D000544), spongiform (MESH:D017825), Prion (MESH:D017096)
- **Species:** Mus musculus (house mouse, species) [taxon 10090]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12636710/full.md

## Figures

10 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12636710/full.md

## References

129 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12636710/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12636710