Correction to “Long‐Term Follow‐Up of Superior Vena Cava–Right Atrium Spontaneous Conduction Block Line Durability Using the White‐Line Approach of Extended Early Meets‐Late Rate Tools”

Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes · Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments · Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Y. Mizunuma, M. Takahashi, T. Sasaki, et al., “Long‐Term Follow‐Up of Superior Vena Cava–Right Atrium Spontaneous Conduction Block Line Durability Using the White‐Line Approach of Extended Early Meets‐Late Rate Tools,” Journal of Arrhythmia 41, no. 4 (2025): e70161, https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.70161.
In the originally published article, the title incorrectly included the word “Rate.” The correct title should read: “Long‐Term Follow‐Up of Superior Vena Cava–Right Atrium Spontaneous Conduction Block Line Durability Using the White‐Line Approach of Extended Early Meets Late Tools.” Furthermore, the term “Early meets‐late” was incorrectly used in several parts of the article. Specifically, this error appears in the article title, in the Background section of the Abstract (“…visualization of the SVC–RA conduction block line as a white line with the extended early meets‐late (EEML) tool…”), and in the Background section of the main text (“The extended early meets‐late (EEML) feature, which indicates a white line…”). In all of these locations, the correct wording should be “Early meets late,” without a hyphen.
In addition, in Table 2 on page 5, the label “Early meets rate lower threshold, %” should read “Early meets late lower threshold, %.”
The authors apologize for these errors.
