Correction to “The effect of uninterrupted and interrupted sitting on vascular function in adults with long COVID”
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLong-Term Effects of COVID-19 · COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies · High Altitude and Hypoxia
Hudson, N., Hannah, S., Husted, M., Fryer, S., Ryan‐Stewart, H., Rickenbach, M., Stone, K., & Faulkner, J. (2025). The effect of uninterrupted and interrupted sitting on vascular function in adults with long COVID. Physiological Reports, 13(19), e70452.
The authors regret that certain errors in numerical values were not corrected at proof stage. In section 3.2 paragraph 2, the text currently reads: “There was no time effect for cfPWV (MD = −0.13, SE = 0.09, p = 0.170).”
It should read: “There was no time effect for cfPWV (MD = 0.13, SE = 0.09, p = 0.170).”
In section 3.1 paragraph 2, Table S3 is mistakenly referenced. The reference should be to Table S2.
In section 3.1 paragraph 2, the text reads “pDBP (77.7 mmHg, SE = 1.0 vs. 72.8 mmHg, SE = 1.6, p = 0.019, ηp2 = 0.063), cDBP (78.2 mmHg, SE = 1.1 vs. 73.6 mmHg, SE = 1.5, p = 0.012, ηp2 = 0.072).”
It should read: “pDBP (77.7 mmHg, SE = 1.0 vs. 72.8 mmHg, SE = 1.5, p = 0.012, ηp2 = 0.072), cDBP (78.2 mmHg, SE = 1.1 vs. 73.6 mmHg, SE = 1.6, p = 0.019, ηp2 = 0.063).”
In Table S2, the p value for pDBP reads as “<0.012.” This should read “0.012.”
We apologize for these errors. The changes do not affect the scientific conclusions of the study or any of the interpretations in the paper.