# In Silico Comparison of Photon Versus Proton Based Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy With Increasing Maximum Peak Dose for Treatment of Primary Renal Cell Carcinoma

**Authors:** Sherif G. Shaaban, Hao Chen, Anh Tran, Aditya Halthore, Rachit Kumar, Michael Goldstein, Daniel Song, Stephen Greco, Heng Li, Curtiland Deville

PMC · DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpt.2025.101210 · International Journal of Particle Therapy · 2025-10-25

## TL;DR

This study compares proton and photon-based radiotherapy for kidney cancer, showing protons reduce damage to nearby organs and better preserve kidney function.

## Contribution

The study demonstrates that proton therapy allows higher peak doses while sparing organs at risk and improving kidney function preservation in renal cell carcinoma.

## Key findings

- Proton therapy significantly reduced dose to organs at risk like the bowel, kidney, and heart compared to photon therapy.
- Proton therapy showed lower ipsilateral kidney V50%/Vtot ratios, linked to better preservation of glomerular filtration rate.
- Protons enabled higher peak dose plans without exceeding normal tissue limits, potentially improving treatment outcomes.

## Abstract

Photon based Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (PH-SBRT) has emerged as a promising option for treatment of primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC), however is associated with decrements in long-term kidney function and toxicity to adjacent organs at risk (OARs).

We compared proton (PT) based SBRT versus PH-SBRT regarding target coverage, OARs, and maximum peak doses of 125% and 142%. All variables were compared using student t-tests.

Target coverage was comparable between plans for gross tumor volume (GTV) and clinical target volume (CTV). OARs were greatly spared by PT-SBRT including small bowel; V5 Gy to V25 Gy and maximum dose (10.47, 20.22, P = .02), large bowel; V5 Gy to V25 Gy and maximum dose (16.16, 23.90, P = .03), all volumes of uninvolved ipsilateral kidney and maximum dose to heart, lungs, esophagus, stomach, duodenum, ipsilateral ureter, and spinal canal. The ratio of ipsilateral kidney V50%/Vtot (volume receiving 50% of the dose/total volume), which is correlated with glomerular filtration rate loss in prospective trials, was significantly lower with PT-SBRT for both maximum dose of 125% (25.41, 19.97, P < .01) and 142% (23.33, 19.18, P < .01). Integral dose was significantly lower with protons. PT-SBRT with higher peak dose allowed for additional sparing of OARs: stomach V 10 Gy, liver V 25 Gy, large bowel V 30 Gy, V 35 Gy, ipsilateral kidney cortex.

PT-SBRT improved target coverage while reducing dose to the involved kidney and adjacent OARs. Protons allow delivery of maximum peak dose escalated plans without exceeding the normal tissues limit and have the potential to better preserve renal function. Prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings and potential clinical benefits.

•There is a growing interest in using proton therapy in RCC.•Protons may be advantageous for poor kidney function or tumors near organs at risk.•PT-SBRT improved coverage and ipsilateral kidney V50%/Vtot, correlated previously with GFR loss.•Protons allow for maximum peak dose escalated plans and potentially better preserve renal function.

There is a growing interest in using proton therapy in RCC.

Protons may be advantageous for poor kidney function or tumors near organs at risk.

PT-SBRT improved coverage and ipsilateral kidney V50%/Vtot, correlated previously with GFR loss.

Protons allow for maximum peak dose escalated plans and potentially better preserve renal function.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** renal cell carcinoma (MONDO:0005086)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** toxicity (MESH:D064420), tumor (MESH:D009369), RCC (MESH:D002292)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12634305/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12634305/full.md

## References

20 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12634305/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12634305