# Burden of allergic rhinitis in the United Kingdom

**Authors:** Michael Jones, Hilary Shepherd, Diane Hatziioanou, Daphne Martin, Chisomo Mutafya, Ulf Bohman, Susan Hodgson, Rachael Williams

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/falgy.2025.1676574 · 2025-11-04

## TL;DR

Allergic rhinitis in the UK leads to increased healthcare use after diagnosis, especially among patients needing specialist care.

## Contribution

Quantifies healthcare resource use differences between primary and secondary care-diagnosed allergic rhinitis patients in the UK.

## Key findings

- Patients diagnosed with AR had increased GP visits, hospitalizations, and prescriptions post-diagnosis.
- Secondary care-diagnosed patients showed higher healthcare resource use compared to primary care-only diagnoses.
- Asthma incidence decreased after AR diagnosis with a shorter interval between asthma onset and AR diagnosis.

## Abstract

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a systemic respiratory condition that is associated with a considerable humanistic burden and is frequently underdiagnosed. Despite the known effects of AR on individual patient well-being, the wider impact of AR on the UK healthcare system remains poorly defined. We aimed to compare healthcare resource use (HCRU) posed by this disease across different age groups between patients who were diagnosed in primary care only vs. those who have a secondary care diagnosis.

In this retrospective, observational study, patients with an AR record (AR diagnosis) and patients with a record of presenting with AR symptoms but no previous AR diagnosis (AR presentation) in the UK between 2009 and 2019 were defined from primary care and secondary care databases. Patients in the AR diagnosis cohort were further categorized based on whether they had a diagnostic code in primary care only, or any relevant diagnostic code(s) in secondary care for allergist or Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) services referrals. Key outcomes included specialist referrals, general practitioner (GP) visits, respiratory-related hospitalizations, GP-prescribed AR-related prescriptions, and coincident asthma.

A total of 3,344,716 patients were defined as presenting signs of AR and 677,771 patients were defined as having an AR diagnosis between 2009 and 2019. Only 11.7% of the AR presentation group received ≥1 referral to an allergist or ENT, and most patients in the AR diagnosis group received a diagnosis in primary care only (89.3%). Compared to their HCRU before diagnosis, patients diagnosed with AR experienced an increase in mean GP visits [7.5–10.0 per patient per year (PPPY)], respiratory-related hospitalizations (5.5–7.1 PPPY), and AR-related medications (mean 8.8–15.0 PPPY). Patients with at least one diagnostic code in secondary care generally reported higher HCRU post-diagnosis than those in primary care. The incidence rate of asthma was lower after AR diagnosis compared to before, with a shorter interval between the onset of asthma and the diagnosis of AR.

Patients with AR impose a greater burden on the UK healthcare system following their diagnosis, especially those who require follow-up from respiratory specialists.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** allergic rhinitis (MONDO:0011786), asthma (MONDO:0004979)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (taxon 9606)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** respiratory condition (MESH:D012131), asthma (MESH:D001249), AR (MESH:D065631)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12631609/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12631609