Differences in biomarker testing in non-small cell lung cancer: real-world outcomes within an integrated healthcare system
William P. Carroway, Nathan J. Alcasid, Alberto Jarrin Lopez, Kenneth Williams, Varada Sarovar, Huyun Dong, Wendy Dyer, Jingrong Yang, Lori C. Sakoda, Jeffrey B. Velotta

TL;DR
This study shows that biomarker testing for lung cancer is more common in advanced stages and is linked to better survival, especially when using next-generation sequencing.
Contribution
The study provides real-world evidence on biomarker testing patterns and outcomes in a diverse NSCLC population.
Findings
Biomarker testing prevalence increased with cancer stage, from 6.9% in stage I to 71.1% in stage IV.
NGS testing was associated with a 13% decrease in 3-year all-cause mortality compared to no testing.
Younger age, never smoking, Asian race, and stage IV disease were independent predictors of biomarker testing.
Abstract
While biomarker testing can guide lung cancer treatment, its real-world application in community practice remains underexplored. This study examines the prevalence, predictors, and outcomes of biomarker testing in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This retrospective cohort study included adults diagnosed with primary NSCLC from 2013 to 2020 within a large integrated healthcare system. We linked cancer registry and electronic health records to determine the prevalence of biomarker testing, including single-gene, multi-gene, and next-generation sequencing (NGS), overall and stratified by patient characteristics including age, gender, race/ethnicity, smoking status, and stage. Multivariable regression analyses were conducted to identify independent predictors of biomarker testing and evaluate associations between type of biomarker testing and 3-year all-cause mortality, overall and…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations · Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment · Lung Cancer Research Studies
