A Qualitative Evaluation Exploring Co‐Production of Falls Management in Care Homes

TL;DR

This study explores how co-production approaches can be used in care homes to manage falls, identifying factors that support or hinder collaboration among stakeholders.

Contribution

The study provides a qualitative evaluation of co-production in care homes, identifying key themes influencing its success.

Findings

Nine themes were identified that influence co-production in care homes, including sharing power and respecting knowledge.

Barriers to co-production included reputational risks, limited resident involvement, and organizational power dynamics.

Facilitators included flexible approaches, stakeholder inclusion, and recognizing diverse expertise.

Abstract

Co‐production approaches are increasingly used in research but are rarely evaluated in care home settings. This study explored factors influencing key principles of co‐production in a series of workshops around falls management in care homes.

Stakeholders (care home residents and relatives, care home staff, and health and social care staff) participating in co‐production workshops as part of a research study were invited to take part in this qualitative evaluation. The workshops were developing a model to implement falls training in care homes as part of a systemic action research study. Non‐participant observations of workshops explored stakeholder interactions. Stakeholders participated in reflection meetings about their experiences of co‐production. Framework analysis mapped key themes to the National Institute for Health and Care Research's (NIHR) principles of co‐production.

Nine themes were identified. Sharing power was affected by two themes: opportunities to challenge dominant voices, resulting from the influence of the research team and separate stakeholder groups, and integrating a disjointed system. Including all perspectives and skills was influenced by two themes: involvement of key stakeholders and a flexible approach. Respecting and valuing knowledge was impacted by two themes: respecting and utilising expertise and experience, and confidence. Two themes relating to reciprocity were identified: benefits and potential harms. One theme related to building and maintaining relationships: team dynamics.

Co‐production in this context is complex and affected by multiple factors. Separate stakeholder groups, a flexible approach and recognising different experiences and expertise facilitated co‐production in line with its key principles. Potential reputational risks, confidence levels and limited involvement of residents, relatives and care home staff in a variety of roles were identified as barriers. Future studies in care homes should consider organisational power dynamics and create safe spaces, providing opportunities for inclusive participation.

A collaborator group, including a patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) advisor and health and social care professionals, contributed to the research methods, presentation of findings and authorship. Care home residents informed the design of the co‐production workshops.

Figures