Functional liver imaging score derived from hepatobiliary-specific contrast-enhanced MRI: a study on agreement and correlation
Hou-yun Xu, Xi-ping Yu, Xiao-chao Yu, Xuan Jin, Lu-ping Wang, Ji-bo Hu, Hong-jie Hu

TL;DR
This study shows that FLIS, a liver imaging score from MRI, reliably assesses liver function and disease severity with high agreement among radiologists and strong correlations with clinical markers.
Contribution
FLIS is demonstrated as a non-invasive, reliable imaging tool for liver function assessment with strong correlations to clinical parameters and diagnostic accuracy.
Findings
FLIS showed excellent inter-observer and intra-observer agreement across radiologists, populations, and hepatobiliary phases.
FLIS strongly correlated with liver function markers like albumin, bilirubin, INR, and CTP scores.
FLIS effectively differentiated CLD stages and CTP grades, with highest accuracy for advanced cirrhosis.
Abstract
To investigate inter-and intra-observer agreement of Functional Liver Imaging Score (FLIS) in different populations, hepatobiliary phase (HBP), and radiologists, while analyzing the correlation between FLIS and liver function. A single-center retrospective study analyzed 203 patients from 2017 to 2021. Inter-observer and intra-observer consistency was assessed by the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) by means of Spearman correlation analysis, evaluating the correlation between FLIS and Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score, as well as the relevant laboratory data. The discriminatory efficacy of FLIS for different stages of CLD and CTP grades was assessed by the receiver operating characteristic curve. In all 203 patients, inter-observer ICC range was 0.885 to 0.954, and intra-observer ICC range was 0.946 to 0.985 among different radiologists. Inter-observer ICC range was 0.908 to…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis · MRI in cancer diagnosis · Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
