Rural women choose self-sampling over a pelvic exam for cervical cancer screening: a mixed-method study
Timothy C. Guetterman, Alexandra Vinson, Matthew Stack, Martha L. Alves, Elizabeth Haro, Emma Alman, Butcher, Christelle El Khoury, Melissa DeJonckheere, Diane M. Harper

TL;DR
Rural women in the US prefer self-sampling for cervical cancer screening over pelvic exams due to comfort and convenience.
Contribution
This study identifies rural women's strong preference for self-sampling over pelvic exams for cervical cancer screening.
Findings
Self-sampling received significantly higher positive ratings than pelvic exams across fourteen perceptions.
Interviews revealed themes of preference, comfort, convenience, and empowerment with self-sampling.
Negative perceptions of pelvic exams may explain low screening participation in rural areas.
Abstract
Barriers to cervical cancer screening are significantly higher among US rural populations. To understand these barriers and explore potential remedies, we compare perceptions of screening exam techniques, pelvic exam vs. self-sampling, and how perceptions vary by participants’ beliefs, physician characteristics, and known barriers among under-screened rural people in Michigan, United States. Our mixed-methods study explored experiences with a vaginal self-sampling technique in comparison to the memory of the most recent pelvic exam. We developed quantitative survey questions using Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) modules. We created the qualitative interview guide using Likert scales and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). We provided vaginal self-sampling kits (HerSwab) to participants to try this new test modality. We used descriptive statistics and t tests to…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCervical Cancer and HPV Research · Global Cancer Incidence and Screening · Reproductive tract infections research
