Analysis of Prenatal Diagnosis and Pregnancy Decisions of 767 Singleton Pregnancies With Positive Prenatal Cell-Free DNA Screening Results in Southwest China
Yun Chen, Yunli Lai, Fuben Xu, Yanqing Tang, Fanglu Wei, Lintao Meng, Haisong Qin, Jiasun Su, Weijia Sun, Yiping Shen, Hongwei Wei

TL;DR
This study examines how pregnant women in China respond to positive prenatal DNA screening results for genetic conditions, focusing on their decisions for further testing and pregnancy continuation.
Contribution
The study provides new insights into the clinical utility of cfDNA screening for copy number variants and parental decision-making in prenatal care.
Findings
89.8% of women with high-chance common trisomies accepted invasive prenatal diagnosis.
95.7% of parents terminated pregnancies confirmed to have pathogenic copy number variants.
Prenatal cfDNA screening for CNVs showed clinical utility despite lower predictive values compared to trisomies.
Abstract
This study explored the associations between positive cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening results and the decisions made by pregnant women regarding invasive diagnosis and continuation of pregnancy. We collected follow-up invasive diagnosis results, pregnancy decisions, and related clinical information for 767 singleton pregnancies with positive cfDNA screening results for common trisomies and genome-wide copy number variants (CNVs) from a cohort of 113,654 singleton pregnancies. A total of 547 (0.48%) cases of high-chance common trisomies and 220 (0.19%) cases of high-chance CNVs (≥ 3 Mb) were identified through cfDNA screening. The acceptance rate for invasive prenatal diagnosis (IPD) was 89.8% (474/520) in high-chance common trisomies and 75.9% (151/195) in those with high-chance CNVs. The positive predicted value of cfDNA screening was 65.4% for common trisomies (310/474) and 29.1%…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics · Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies · Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
