The experience of trial participation disclosure among sex workers in a phase IIb HIV vaccine trial: A qualitative study in urban Tanzania
Joel Seme Ambikile, Edith A.M. Tarimo, Masunga K. Iseselo, Gift Lukumay, Patricia Munseri, Muhammad Bakari, Eligius Lyamuya, Said Aboud, Rachel Kawuma, Janet Seeley, Sarah Jose, Katrien G. Janin, Stephen Bell, Stephen Bell, Stephen Bell

TL;DR
This study explores how female sex workers in Tanzania experienced disclosing their participation in an HIV vaccine trial, highlighting the social and personal factors influencing their decisions.
Contribution
The study provides novel insights into the qualitative experiences of disclosure and non-disclosure in an HIV vaccine trial among sex workers in Tanzania.
Findings
Volunteers disclosed trial participation to seek support or share information with trusted individuals.
Non-disclosure was driven by a lack of understanding and concerns about inadequate support.
Disclosure consequences included fears of side effects, HIV infection perceptions, and trial disapproval.
Abstract
Globally, HIV vaccine clinical trials are conducted in the quest for an effective preventive vaccine. Volunteers’ participation is vital to the success of these trials. However, disclosing involvement in a vaccine trial may have significant consequences, potentially affecting key aspects such as recruitment, retention, and overall engagement. This study aimed to explore the experiences of disclosure and non-disclosure of participation in a Phase IIb HIV Vaccine Trial among female sex workers in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and used a descriptive qualitative design. Fifteen in-depth interviews and four focus group discussions were conducted among volunteers who were participating in the HIV vaccine trial. Data analysis was done manually using the framework method. Three themes emerged: reasons for disclosure, reasons for non-disclosure, and consequences of disclosure. Reasons for disclosure…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics in Clinical Research · HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions · Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
