# ‘A Forever Imprint on Me…I Couldn't Be There When He Needed Me the Most’: Care Partner Experiences of Patient Safety During Covid‐19 Restrictions

## TL;DR

This study explores how care partners felt about patient safety during hospital visits when they were restricted from being present due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

## Contribution

It provides new insights into care partners' experiences and the impact of restricted access on patient safety and their well-being.

## Key findings

- Hospital restrictions during the pandemic caused stress and communication issues for care partners.
- Care partners felt their absence increased patient safety risks and their own emotional distress.
- Maintaining care partner involvement is crucial for effective patient safety and risk reduction.

## Abstract

It is believed that engaging care partners (CPs) in patient safety is a potential strategy to ensure patients' well‐being during hospital admissions. When present, CPs who feel comfortable can be ‘safety nets’, monitoring and acting to prevent healthcare‐related harm. However, there are limitations in evidence about CPs' perspectives regarding and experiences of safety engagement at the direct care level and the implications if they have restricted access, such as during the Covid‐19 pandemic.

To understand CPs' experiences of patient safety when, due to Covid‐19 restrictions, they were unable to be present in the hospital during a patient admission.

A descriptive, exploratory qualitative study was conducted in an acute care hospital in Ontario, Canada, and four Canadian organisations that support CPs. One‐to‐one semi‐structured interviews and reflexive thematic analysis were completed.

Twelve CPs participated. Overall, they believed hospital restrictions had consequences on patient safety and was troubling for them and their loved ones, as illuminated in the three main themes: Stress Escalates Amid Disrupted, Ineffective Communications Between CPs and Patients/Healthcare Professionals; CPs' Patient Safety Concerns Change and are Heightened in Their Absence From the Bedside, Calling for New Tactics, and Hospital Access Restriction Negatively Impacts CPs' Well‐Being, Necessitating Creative Ways to Bolster Their Strength.

The findings give insight into CPs' engagement in patient safety at the direct care level and the importance of being present, given the types of contributions they want to make. Communication was paramount, and the scope of their involvement—the nuances of which became more apparent in their absence—affirmed how connected CPs are and need to be within the health team for successful risk reduction. Disconnecting CPs from engaging in safety diminished the patient's protection, and instead of reducing CP fears related to involvement, it escalated newfound worries and stressors.

This study highlights CPs' experiences with patient safety when they cannot be at the bedside and their crucial role in mitigating risks, and, in anticipation of future public health crises, as well as ongoing care approaches, questions the risk in prohibiting and not fostering CPs' involvement at the bedside.

Twelve CPs of adult patients with lived experiences of engaging in patient safety participated in this study. These CPs were unable to be present with the patient during their admission due to visitor restrictions implemented as a result of Covid‐19.