Correction to: Incomplete tricarboxylic acid cycle and proton gradient in Pandoravirus massiliensis: is it still a virus?
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBacteriophages and microbial interactions · Plant Virus Research Studies · Viral Infections and Vectors
This is a second correction to: Sarah Aherfi, Djamal Brahim Belhaouari, Lucile Pinault, Jean-Pierre Baudoin, Philippe Decloquement, Jonatas Abrahao, Philippe Colson, Anthony Levasseur, David C Lamb, Eric Chabriere, Didier Raoult, Bernard La Scola, Incomplete tricarboxylic acid cycle and proton gradient in Pandoravirus massiliensis: is it still a virus? The ISME Journal, Volume 16, Issue 3, March 2022, Pages 695–704, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-021-01117-3
In June 2024, a correction was published regarding Figure 3, panel A2[1]. In November 2024, an additional concern was raised regarding Figure 3, panels C2 and D2. Upon review, the authors confirmed panel C2 (representing the 200 µM condition) had mistakenly been duplicated in panel D2 (representing the 300 µM condition).
This duplication occurred during figure assembly and does not represent the actual experimental condition.
The quantitative measurements for all data at each specific condition were not impacted by this mistake, and the original results, discussion, and conclusions remain unchanged.
The authors have replaced panel D2 in Figure 3 below.
The authors sincerely apologise unreservedly for this second error.
The error is outlined only in this notice to preserve the version of record.