# Development and verification of lymphangiogenesis score for prediction of prognosis and immune landscape in gastric cancer

**Authors:** Shihe Liu, Qiying Song, Runkai Chen, Di Wu, Xinxin Wang

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1595592 · Frontiers in Immunology · 2025-11-04

## TL;DR

This study develops a lymphangiogenesis score to predict prognosis and immune response in gastric cancer patients.

## Contribution

A novel lymphangiogenesis score (LYMS) is developed and validated for predicting prognosis and immunotherapy response in gastric cancer.

## Key findings

- High LYMS is associated with poorer prognosis in gastric cancer patients.
- High LYMS correlates with reduced immunotherapy response and chemotherapy efficacy.
- LYMS is an independent prognostic risk factor for gastric cancer.

## Abstract

Gastric cancer (GC) is a leading gastrointestinal malignancy carrying a poor prognosis. Lymphangiogenesis (LYM) refers to the process of forming new lymphatic vessels. This process facilitates tumor metastasis and represents a promising therapeutic target in GC management. However, the exact mechanisms of LYM in GC remain incompletely understood.

The RNA-sequencing gene expression dataset and clinical characteristics of GC patients were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. The LASSO Cox regression method was utilized to identify feature genes and construct a Lymphangiogenesis Score (LYMS). A nomogram was constructed to assess the predictive efficacy of LYMS in the prognosis of GC patients. The gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) employed to investigate different molecular functions and pathways. The immune microenvironment analysis, immunotherapy response analysis, and drug sensitivity were conducted to elucidate the association between LYMS and both immune landscape and immunotherapy response.

This study selected six LYM-related genes (ADAMTS1, SVEP1, CAV1, NOX4, NPTX1, and SPARC) to construct the LYMS. The results demonstrated that GC patients with a high LYMS exhibited significantly poorer prognosis. Distinct enrichment patterns of molecular functions and pathways were observed between the high and low LYMS groups. Furthermore, marked differences in immune landscape were identified. Immunotherapy response analysis and drug sensitivity analysis further indicated that high-LYMS patients showed reduced benefit to immunotherapy and diminished efficacy of certain chemotherapy agents.

Overall, this study confirmed that LYMS is an independent prognostic risk factor in GC patients. The LYMS demonstrates significant predictive ability for responses to immunotherapy, suggesting its potential to guide future immunotherapy interventions for GC patients.

## Linked entities

- **Genes:** ADAMTS1 (ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif 1) [NCBI Gene 9510], SVEP1 (sushi, von Willebrand factor type A, EGF and pentraxin domain containing 1) [NCBI Gene 79987], CAV1 (caveolin 1) [NCBI Gene 857], NOX4 (NADPH oxidase 4) [NCBI Gene 50507], NPTX1 (neuronal pentraxin 1) [NCBI Gene 4884], SPARC (secreted protein acidic and cysteine rich) [NCBI Gene 6678]
- **Diseases:** gastric cancer (MONDO:0001056)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** SVEP1 (sushi, von Willebrand factor type A, EGF and pentraxin domain containing 1) [NCBI Gene 79987] {aka C9orf13, CCP22, POLYDOM, SEL-OB, SELOB}, CAV1 (caveolin 1) [NCBI Gene 857] {aka BSCL3, CGL3, LCCNS, MSTP085, PPH3, VIP21}, ADAMTS1 (ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif 1) [NCBI Gene 9510] {aka C3-C5, METH1}, SPARC (secreted protein acidic and cysteine rich) [NCBI Gene 6678] {aka BM-40, OI17, ON, ONT}, NPTX1 (neuronal pentraxin 1) [NCBI Gene 4884] {aka NP1, SCA50}, NOX4 (NADPH oxidase 4) [NCBI Gene 50507] {aka KOX, KOX-1, RENOX}
- **Diseases:** gastrointestinal malignancy (MESH:D005770), Cancer (MESH:D009369), tumor metastasis (MESH:D009362), GC (MESH:D013274)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12623391/full.md

## Figures

8 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12623391/full.md

## References

80 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12623391/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12623391