Correction to: “Central Precocious Puberty in Males, GnRH Analog Treated or Untreated, Did Not Impact Fertility and Health in Midadulthood”
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBirth, Development, and Health · Body Composition Measurement Techniques
In the above-named article by Lazar L, Oron T, Yackobovitch-Gavan M, Tenenbaum A, Phillip M, Meyerovitch J, and de Vries L (J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2025; doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaf427) there was an error in the Table 2.
In the originally published article, in Table 2, under the fifth column titled “Controls,” in the second row titled “Age, median (IQR), yrs,” the median age for controls was written as “4 (40, 46).” In the corrected article, “4 (40, 46)” has been corrected to read “44 (40, 46).”
The article has been corrected online.