# Accuracy of Digital Anthropometry During Pregnancy: A Longitudinal Study

## TL;DR

This study compares 3D imaging with traditional tape measurements for tracking body changes during pregnancy and finds strong agreement.

## Contribution

The study demonstrates the feasibility and accuracy of 3D-optical imaging as an alternative to conventional anthropometry during pregnancy.

## Key findings

- 3D-optical measurements showed strong agreement with tape measurements at multiple body sites during pregnancy.
- Linear regression analyses showed high R2 values (0.63–0.97) across all measured sites.
- Small biases were observed in some measures, suggesting potential impacts of advancing pregnancy on measurement accuracy.

## Abstract

Maternal anthropometric changes are rapid during pregnancy and reflect increments in maternal and fetal tissues. These dynamic changes in body composition and shape during pregnancy are associated with maternal and fetal outcomes and are often monitored with simple tools such as a flexible tape for quantifying selected circumferences. The current study aim was to evaluate the hypothesis that circumferential measures of maternal body size and shape acquired with a 3D-optical imaging system will agree closely and correlate significantly with ground-truth estimates made with a flexible tape by trained staff.

3D-optical scans and flexible tape measurements were acquired at 15-, 25-, and 35-weeks of gestation in 57, 41, and 35 participants, respectively. 3D avatars obtained at each time point were analyzed for waist at two sites, hip, mid-upper arm, mid-thigh, and calf circumferences. 3D-optical and flexible tape measurements were compared using linear regression analyses (R2s), mean absolute errors (MAEs), root-mean square errors (RMSEs), concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs), and Bland-Altman plots.

Overall, agreement between 3D and conventional anthropometric measurements were strong at all five anatomic sites (R2s, 0.63–0.97; p’s all < 0.001; MAEs, −8.5–0.8 cm; RMSEs, 0.61–9.94 cm; and CCCs 0.6–1.0; small significant (p < 0.05) bias was present at some sites/timepoints for some measures). Post-hoc analyses revealed potential basis for impact of advancing pregnancy on between-method agreement.

Feasible implementation and accuracy, as shown in the current study, strongly support further development of 3D-optical technology as an alternative to conventional anthropometry for evaluating and monitoring body size, shape, and composition over the course of pregnancy.