# A Survey of Current Practice and Perspectives on Lymphadenectomy in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Endometrial Cancer in Japan

## TL;DR

This study explores how minimally invasive surgery and changing guidelines are affecting lymph node dissection practices for endometrial cancer in Japan.

## Contribution

The study provides insights into the factors influencing lymphadenectomy practices in Japan, particularly the impact of clinical guidelines and work-style reforms.

## Key findings

- Laparoscopy is more commonly used than robotic surgery for minimally invasive endometrial cancer surgery in Japan.
- Clinical guidelines from the Japanese Society of Gynecologic Oncology have the greatest impact on lymphadenectomy practices.
- Physician work-style reform affects surgical scheduling but has limited influence on lymph node dissection criteria.

## Abstract

This study investigated the reasons behind the decreasing trend of lymph node dissection for endometrial cancer (EC) in Japan, focusing on the impact of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) adoption, evolving clinical guidelines, and physician work‐style reform.

A cross‐sectional survey of the Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology and Endoscopy (JSGOE) members was conducted to investigate facility demographics, MIS adoption, lymphadenectomy practices, factors influencing omission, impact of work‐style reform, and perspectives on future EC management, such as molecular classification and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB).

In total, 424 responses were received, representing a response rate of 67.8%. MIS adoption for EC is widespread in Japan, with laparoscopy preferred over robotic surgery. Lymphadenectomy is commonly performed; however, the criteria for omission varied among institutions, with clinical guidelines published by the Japanese Society of Gynecologic Oncology having the greatest impact. Physician work‐style reform significantly affected surgical practices such as surgical scheduling, adherence to time limits, and the number of surgeons participating in surgeries, while it had little impact on the criteria for lymphadenectomy omission. The adoption of molecular classifications is increasing with approximately half of the institutions planning to implement or having partially implemented them, while SLNBs remained relatively low.

This study highlights the significant impact of evolving clinical guidelines on lymphadenectomy practices for MIS for EC in Japan, and the limited impact of physician work‐style reform.