# Concordance between self- and clinician ratings of depression during inpatient treatment in adolescents: changes over time and probable response shift

**Authors:** Ferdinand Keller, Martin Holtmann, Michael Kölch, Tanja Legenbauer

PMC · DOI: 10.1186/s13034-025-00993-3 · Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health · 2025-11-15

## TL;DR

This study found that self- and clinician ratings of depression in adolescents become more aligned over time during treatment, possibly due to a response shift.

## Contribution

The study provides evidence of a response shift in adolescents' perception of depression during treatment.

## Key findings

- Correlation between self- and clinician ratings increased from moderate at baseline to strong at four weeks.
- Reliability of both rating instruments improved over time with a simpler factor structure.
- Initial rater agreement had little predictive value for treatment outcomes.

## Abstract

Correlations between self-reported and clinician-rated severity of depression are often only moderate, but studies in adults have shown that they increase over time. This study explored whether a similar effect occurs in adolescents and whether initial agreement vs. disagreement between self- and clinician ratings predicts differential outcomes.

The analyzed data stem from a randomized controlled trial (DeLight) that explored the effect of bright light therapy as an add-on to treatment as usual in an inpatient sample of adolescents (n = 224). Depression was assessed at four time points (baseline, 4 weeks, 16 weeks, 28 weeks) using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) as a self-report measure and the Children’s Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) as a blinded clinician rating.

The correlation between self- and clinician ratings was only moderate at baseline (r = .40) but increased considerably to a strong correlation at four weeks (r = .72), which was maintained thereafter. The predictive value of initial rater agreement / disagreement for the outcome was small (BDI-II) or non-significant (CDRS-R). Further analyses revealed that the reliability of both instruments increased over time and the factor structure became simpler, with fewer factors and higher factor loadings.

These findings indicate increasing homogeneity within self- and clinician ratings over time and suggest that some type of response shift occurred, with adolescents appearing to increasingly view their depression as a unified concept. A consideration of response shifts could lead to more accurate assessments of treatment effectiveness.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13034-025-00993-3.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** depression (MONDO:0002050)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Depression (MESH:D003866)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12619375/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12619375/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12619375