Hormonal and reproductive factors and risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Chinese women: a case-control study
Xiao-Ying Su, Axel Schroder, Lap Ah Tse, Ignatius Tak-sun Yu, Shao-Hua Xie

TL;DR
A study in Hong Kong found limited evidence linking hormonal and reproductive factors to an increased risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in women.
Contribution
This is the first study to explore several hormonal exposures in relation to nasopharyngeal carcinoma risk in Chinese women.
Findings
Late menarche and a history of miscarriages were initially linked to higher NPC risk, but the associations weakened after adjusting for other factors.
No significant associations were found between other hormonal and reproductive factors and NPC risk.
The study's small sample size led to inconclusive results regarding the role of sex hormones in NPC development.
Abstract
Sex hormones may play a role in the development of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), but the evidence is limited. This case-control study collected information on sex hormonal and reproductive factors of 99 female incident NPC cases and 109 female controls in Hong Kong through face-to-face interviews. An increased risk of NPC associated with late menarche and spontaneous miscarriage history was indicated when adjusted for age only, the age-adjusted odds ratio (OR) were 2.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04–4.72 for menarche at ages > 14 years, 2.31 (95% CI 1.03–5.18) for one miscarriage, and 4.00 (95% CI 1.04–15.31) for ≥ 2 miscarriages. But such associations were attenuated after adjustment for additional potential confounders, the fully-adjusted OR were 1.78 (95% CI 0.76–4.14) for menarche at ages > 14 years, 2.11 (95% CI 0.90–4.99) for one miscarriage, and 3.42 (95% CI 0.76–15.32)…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
- —Karolinska Institute
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHead and Neck Cancer Studies · Head and Neck Surgical Oncology · Oral Health Pathology and Treatment
Background
The incidence of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) varies greatly across geographical regions. It is rare in most parts of the world, but high incidence rates are noted in certain areas, including Southern China [1]. In 2021, the crude incidence rates of NPC were 16.5 and 5.3 per 100,000 in men and women, respectively, in Hong Kong [2].
NPC is more common in men than in women, and sex hormones may be involved in its development. A potential protective role of estrogens has been suggested by a delayed development of NPC among females, by around 5–10 years before menopause ages [3]. This hypothesis is also supported by potential anticancer properties of estrogen through mechanisms including inhibition of inflammation and initiating apoptosis in cancer cells [4]. However, a recent case-control study in Southern China reported an increased risk of NPC associated with a history of pregnancy or delivery in women [5]. The influence of sex hormonal exposures on the risk of NPC remains to be clarified.
This study aimed to assess the associations between sex hormonal and reproductive factors and NPC risk in Hong Kong women. We hypothesized that certain female sex hormonal exposures decrease the risk of NPC.
Methods
This study included 99 female NPC patients and 109 female control participants in a case-control study conducted between June 2010 and December 2012 in Hong Kong. All newly diagnosed NPC patients with histological confirmation in Queen Elizabeth Hospital housing the largest oncology center in Hong Kong during the study period were recruited, and control participants were outpatients attending multiple clinical units of the same hospital and were frequency-matched by age (± 5 years) and residence district. Control participants were admitted to hospital for a wide range of health conditions. Considerable proportions of referents were diagnosed with diseases of the circulatory system (27%), diseases of the nervous system (13%), endocrine, nutritional and metabolic diseases (10.0%), and merely symptoms, signs and abnormal clinical and laboratory findings (12.7%). None of the other disease groups accounted for a proportion of 10% or more. Detailed information about the recruitment of participants can be found elsewhere [6, 7]. Information on the following sex hormonal exposures and reproductive factors were obtained through face-to-face interviews: age of menarche, menopause and first delivery, histories of pregnancies, deliveries and spontaneous miscarriage, and use of oral contraceptives and hormonal replacement therapy. The specific questions regarding these exposures are provided in the Appendix.
Statistical analysis
Unconditional logistic regression was used to assess the associations between sex hormonal exposures and NPC risk, providing estimates for odds ratios (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) with adjustment for age, education level, smoking status, family history of NPC, consumption of salted fish during childhood, and daily domestic incense burning. All statistical analysis was conducted by using SAS 9.4 software (SAS Institute Inco., Cary, NC) and a two-sided P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
The distribution of socioeconomic characteristics and main risk factors for NPC among cases and control participants is presented in Table 1.
Table 1. Distribution of social-demographic characteristics and main risk factors for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), number (%)VariablesCases(N = 99)Controls(N = 109)Age, years Mean (SD)50.8 (± 9.3)49.9 (± 11.1) <4525 (25.3)36 (33.0) 45–5141 (41.4)39 (35.8) ≥5533 (33.3)34 (31.3)Education level Primary school or lower38 (38.4)25 (22.9) Middle school52 (52.2)53 (48.6) Collage or higher9 (9.1)31 (28.4)Employment status Unemployment48 (48.5)43 (29.5) Employed51 (51.5)66 (66.6)Married status Single14 (14.1)18 (16.5) Married/cohabiting70 (70.1)77 (70.6) Divorced/widowed/separated13 (13.1)13 (11.9) Missing2 (2.0)1 (0.9)Smoking status Non-smoker84 (84.9)99 (90.8) Current smoker10 (10.1)9 (8.3) Ex-smoker5 (5.1)1 (0.9)Environmental tobacco smokes exposure No24 (24.2)39 (35.8) At work or at home66 (66.7)63 (57.8) Both9 (9.1)7 (6.4)NPC family history in first relatives No79 (79.8)104 (95.4) Yes20 (20.2)5 (4.6)Salted fish intake during childhood < Monthly38 (38.4)51 (46.8) Monthly27 (27.3)34 (31.2) At least weekly30 (30.3)19 (17.4) Missing4 (4.0)5 (4.6) Self-reported occupational exposure31 (31.3)15 (13.8) Daily domestic burning incense64 (64.7)47 (43.1)^^Exposures to any of cotton dust, chemical fumes, welding fumes and disinfectants
Menarche at age of 14 years or later was associated with an increased risk of NPC when adjusted for age only (OR = 2.22, 95% CI 1.04–4.72), but such association was statistically insignificant after adjustments for additional covariates (OR = 1.78, 95% CI 0.76–4.14). History of spontaneous miscarriage was associated with an increased risk of NPC. The age-adjusted OR were 2.31 (95% CI 1.03–5.18) for one miscarriage and 4.00 (95% CI 1.04–15.31) for two or more miscarriages, but such associations were attenuated with further adjustment (OR = 2.11, 95% CI 0.90–4.99 for one miscarriage; OR = 3.42, 95% CI 0.76–15.32 for two or more miscarriages; P for trend 0.0274). No associations were found for the other studied exposures, including menstrual cycle regularity, menopausal status, use of oral contraceptives, number of pregnancies and deliveries, and age at first delivery (Table 2).
Table 2. Associations between sex hormonal and reproductive factors and risk of nasopharyngeal carcinomaExposuresCases (N = 99)Controls (N = 109)Age-adjusted OR (95% CI)Fully adjusted OR^^ (95% CI)Age of menarche, years <1333 (33.3)41 (37.6)1.00 (Reference)1.00 (Reference) 13–1424 (24.2)40 (36.7)0.75 (0.38–1.50)0.78 (0.36–1.66) >1433 (33.3)19 (17.4)2.22 (1.04–4.72)1.78 (0.76–4.14) Missing9 (9.1)9 (8.3) P for trend0.06570.2559Menstrual cycle regularity Regular12 (12.1)15 (13.8)1.00 (Reference)1.00 (Reference) Irregular80 (80.1)90 (82.6)0.92 (0.40–2.13)0.66 (0.26–1.69) Missing7 (7.1)4 (3.7)Postmenopausal status No51 (51.5)51 (46.8)1.00 (Reference)1.00 (Reference) Yes41 (41.4)45(41.2)0.79 (0.33–1.90)0.54 (0.19–1.50) Missing7 (7.1)13 (12.0)Ever pregnancy No20 (20.2)21 (19.3)1.00 (Reference)1.00 (Reference) Yes79 (79.8)88 (80.7)0.90 (0.45–1.81)0.81 (0.36–1.81)Number of pregnancies 020 (20.2)21 (19.3)1.37 (0.65–2.90)1.40 (0.60–3.30) 1–236 (36.4)52 (47.7)1.00 (Reference)1.00 (Reference) ≥341 (41.4)33 (30.3)1.82 (0.93–3.58)1.58 (0.74–3.39) Missing2 (2.0)3 (2.8) P for trend0.38890.6932Number of deliveries 025 (25.3)23 (21.1)1.40 (0.71–2.79)1.48 (0.67–3.25) 1–249 (49.5)61 (56.0)1.00 (Reference)1.00 (Reference) ≥322 (22.2)23 (21.1)1.09 (0.53–2.28)0.86 (0.37–1.97) Missing3 (3.0)2 (1.8) P for trend0.54440.2941Age at first delivery No20 (20.2)21 (19.2)1.00 (Reference)1.00 (Reference) ≤2747 (47.5)44 (40.4)1.10 (0.51–2.40)0.89(0.36–2.22) >2724 (24.2)39 (35.8)0.64 (0.29–1.43)0.64 (0.26–1.58) Missing8 (8.1)5 (4.6) P for trend0.20690.3051Number of spontaneous miscarriages 069 (69.7)93 (85.3)1.00 (Reference)1.00 (Reference) 119 (19.2)11 (10.1)2.31 (1.03–5.18)2.11 (0.90–4.99) ≥29 (9.1)3 (2.8)4.00 (1.04–15.31)3.42 (0.76–15.32) Missing2 (2.0)2 (1.8) P for trend0.0070.0274Ever use of oral contraceptives No61 (61.6)70 (64.2)1.00 (Reference)1.00 (Reference) Yes32 (32.3)34 (31.2)1.07 (0.59–1.94)1.03 (0.53-2.00) Missing6 (6.1)5 (4.6)^^Adjusted for age, education level, smoking status, family history of nasopharyngeal carcinoma, consumption of salted fish during childhood, and daily domestic incense burning
Discussion
Epidemiological evidence regarding the role of sex hormones in NPC has been sparse. To our knowledge, the associations between reproductive factors and NPC risk have been reported in a previous case-control study only [5]. For the first time, the present study investigated several sex hormonal exposures including age of menarche and first delivery, menstrual cycle regularity, history of spontaneous miscarriage, and use of oral contraceptives and hormonal replacement therapy. Overall, no associations were found between the studied exposures and NPC risk in women. A seemingly increased NPC risk associated with spontaneous miscarriage was noted, which however may be explained by residual confounding or chance.
Limitations of the present study mainly include the hospital-based design due to practical difficulties, retrospectively collected information on exposures, no adjustment for Epstein-Barr virus infection, and the limited sample size due to the rarity of NPC particularly in women, with post hoc estimation of statistical power ranging 0.09–0.54 only. Exposure misclassification was probably non-differential because sex hormonal exposures are not established risk factors of NPC and participants were unaware of the study hypothesis.
An early cross-sectional analysis of 14 Kenyan men with NPC reported substantially low levels of dehydroepiandrosterone-sulphate in Kenyan men with NPC compared with control participants [8], but no prospective studies have direct assessed endogenous sex hormone levels in relation to NPC risk.
In summary, our findings do not support the hypothesis that sex hormonal exposures influence the risk of NPC in women. More epidemiological studies are warranted to further clarify the role of sex hormonal exposures in the development of NPC.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary Material 1.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Hong Kong Cancer Registry. Overview of Hong Kong Cancer Statistics of 2021. Available at: https://www 3.ha.org.hk/cancereg/pub.html. Accessed January 2, 2024.
