# Optimizing neutralization strategies for microbial testing of non-sterile pharmaceutical finished products with challenging method suitability

**Authors:** Ahmed Eldemerdash, Radwa Ewaisha, Mustafa Alseqely, Michael G. Shehat

PMC · DOI: 10.1186/s12866-025-04456-9 · BMC Microbiology · 2025-11-15

## TL;DR

This paper presents optimized methods for microbial testing of pharmaceutical products that are difficult to neutralize, ensuring safer quality control.

## Contribution

The study introduces detailed protocols for method suitability testing, particularly for products with challenging antimicrobial activity.

## Key findings

- An acceptable microbial recovery of at least 84% was achieved for all standard strains using various neutralization methods.
- Forty of 133 products required multiple optimization steps, with different approaches used based on product type and antimicrobial activity.
- Testing for B. cepacia complex was included, highlighting its importance in quality control for aqueous dosage forms.

## Abstract

Method suitability for microbial limit tests during microbiological quality control (QC) can be a complicated process that requires multiple steps of optimization and plays a central role in ensuring reliable QC results. When antimicrobial activity of a given product cannot be neutralized, it is assumed that the inhibited microorganism is not present in the product, as specified by the U.S. pharmacopeia. This can potentially lead to contaminants that can multiply during storage or use, resulting in potential health risks or even death.

Method suitability testing was performed on a total of 133 pharmaceutical finished products as part of microbiological QC testing performed prior to product marketing. For total microbial count, depending on the pharmaceutical dosage form, testing included sequential trials of different dilution factors up to 1:200, the addition of 1–5% tween (polysorbate) 80, 0.7% lecithin, and/or filtration using different membrane filter types until the optimal method was selected for each product. Method suitability for microbial limit tests as well as for absence of specific pathogens was verified using a range of bacteria and fungi including Burkholderia cepacia.

There was an acceptable microbial recovery of at least 84% for all standard strains with all neutralization methods, demonstrating minimal to no toxicity. Forty of 133 finished products required multiple steps of optimization. Of these, 18 were neutralized through 1:10 dilution with diluent warming. Another 8 had no inherent antimicrobial activity to their API and were neutralized through dilution and the addition of tween 80. Neutralization of the remaining 13 products (mostly antimicrobial drugs) was achieved through variations of different dilution factors and filtration with different membrane filter types with multiple rinsing steps.

Our results provide detailed protocols that can help guide method suitability testing of finished pharmaceutical products for which neutralization proves challenging. We also include testing for B. cepacia complex in aqueous dosage form, often overlooked in the QC process. Since the current QC practice mostly assumes that these products do not require further testing, similar studies are especially needed to ensure the safety of finished pharmaceutical products during marketing, storage, and use.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** tween 80 (PubChem CID 443315), lecithin (PubChem CID 10425706)
- **Species:** Burkholderia cepacia (taxon 292)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** toxicity (MESH:D064420)
- **Chemicals:** lecithin (MESH:D054709), tween 80 (MESH:D011136), tween (polysorbate) 80 (-)
- **Species:** Bacteria Latreille et al. 1825 (Bacteria stick insect, genus) [taxon 629395], Burkholderia cepacia (species) [taxon 292]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12619157/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12619157/full.md

## References

17 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12619157/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12619157