Is there a difference in the spread of excitation at different electrode locations along the cochlea?
Georgea Espindola Ribeiro, Ana Tereza de Matos Magalhães, Maria Valéria Schmidt Goffi Gomez, Carolina Gianzantti da Costa, Robinson Koji Tsuji, Rubens Vuono de Brito, Georgea Espindola Ribeiro, Ana Tereza de Matos Magalhães, Maria Valéria Schmidt Goffi Gomez

TL;DR
This study found that the spread of excitation in the cochlea is wider in the medial region compared to other areas, regardless of the type of cochlear implant electrode used.
Contribution
The study provides new evidence on the regional differences in excitation spread in the cochlea during cochlear implantation.
Findings
The medial electrode showed a significantly wider spread of excitation compared to the basal and apical electrodes.
There were no significant differences in peak amplitudes among the evaluated electrodes in both perimodiolar and straight arrays.
The findings suggest the importance of objective testing for more effective cochlear implant programming.
Abstract
To identify whether there are differences in the amplitude and width of spread of excitation (SOE) across the apical, medial and basal regions of the cochlea. Cross-sectional retrospective study approved by the Ethics Committee of the institution. The study included adults with postlingual deafness, undergoing cochlear implant (CI) surgery, with present intraoperative neural responses in which the SOE was investigated in the basal (6), medial (11) and apical (16) electrodes. Neural response telemetry thresholds, peak amplitudes (µv) of the SOE function and SOE width in millimeters were collected and grouped by the electrode array type for analysis using the Mann Whitney and Kruskal Wallis tests. Seventy-one subjects were selected, 27 with perimodiolar array and 44 with straight array. There were no significant differences in the peak amplitudes among evaluated electrodes in both…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHearing Loss and Rehabilitation · Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics · Noise Effects and Management
