Analysis of treatment options and survival outcomes for patients with localized prostate cancer: a focus on androgen deprivation therapy

TL;DR

This study compares androgen deprivation therapy with surgery and radiotherapy for prostate cancer in resource-limited areas, finding ADT to have better survival outcomes.

Contribution

The study provides new evidence that ADT can be an effective treatment for localized prostate cancer in settings where surgery and radiotherapy are unavailable.

Findings

ADT showed 58.4% 5-year overall survival in localized prostate cancer patients.

ADT outperformed surgery and radiotherapy in survival outcomes after propensity score matching.

Prostate-specific antigen, ISUP grade, and BMI were key predictors of progression-free survival.

Abstract

Management of localized prostate cancer (PCa) remains challenging in resource-limited settings where access to surgery and radiotherapy is restricted. This study assessed the survival outcomes of patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone compared with other modalities.

We retrospectively analyzed patients with localized PCa treated with ADT at Taiyuan Central Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from 2002 to 2023. Cox regression identified prognostic factors for overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Outcomes were compared with SEER database cohorts receiving radical prostatectomy (RP), radiotherapy (RT), or no treatment. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline characteristics.

Among 86 patients in the ADT cohort, the median follow-up was 2,152.5 days. Median OS was 2,378 days, with 5-year OS, DSS, and PFS rates of 58.4%, 85.2%, and 72.5%, respectively. Cox analysis identified prostate-specific antigen, ISUP grade, and body mass index as independent predictors of PFS. After PSM for age and ISUP grade, the ADT group showed significantly better OS and DSS than RP, RT, or no treatment cohorts in the SEER database.

ADT demonstrated favorable survival outcomes compared with RP and RT in elderly patients with high-grade localized PCa. These results highlight ADT as a potential alternative where invasive options are less feasible, providing insights into optimizing treatment strategies for resource-limited settings.

Figures