# The impact of the CERTAIN clinical decision support tool for structured intensive care unit admission and rounding is patient sex-independent: a secondary analysis of CERTAIN

**Authors:** Pien Swart, Aysun Tekin, Yue Dong, Marija Vukoja, Rahul Kashyap, Ognjen Gajic, Frederique Paulus, Marcus J. Schultz

PMC · DOI: 10.62675/2965-2774.20250017 · 2025-09-09

## TL;DR

A clinical decision support tool improved ICU care practices equally for male and female patients across different countries.

## Contribution

Demonstrated that the CERTAIN tool's impact on ICU care adherence is independent of patient sex and country income level.

## Key findings

- No notable difference in care adherence between male and female patients before or after CERTAIN implementation.
- Both sexes in high- and middle-income countries benefited equally from the CERTAIN tool.
- Implementation of CERTAIN increased adherence to best care practices in ICU settings.

## Abstract

Implementing the Checklist for Early Recognition and Treatment of Acute Illness and Injury (CERTAIN) decision support tool for structured intensive care unit admission and rounding was associated with an increased adherence to best care practices. We determined whether this association was patient sex-dependent.

Post hoc analysis of CERTAIN.

prospective multinational quality improvement study.

Adult patients admitted to one of the participating intensive care units.

Implementation of the CERTAIN decision support tool.

We compared incidence rates of omission of delivery of ten best care practices, including deep vein thrombosis and peptic ulcer prophylaxis, head of bed elevation, daily oral care, spontaneous breathing trials, family conferences, assessment of need for central lines and urinary catheters, and prescription of antimicrobials and sedation, between sexes, before and after implementation of the decision support tool. In addition, we determined whether sex differences existed amongst high-and middle-income countries.

CERTAIN comprised a total of 4,256 patients, with 588 females and 859 males before the implementation of the decision support tool and 1,169 females and 1,640 males after its implementation. Overall, there was no notable difference in care between sexes, neither before nor after implementation, and both sexes in high-income and middle-income countries experienced equal benefits from checklist implementation.

The impact of a clinical decision support tool for structured intensive care unit admission and rounding on adherence to best care practices showed minimal variation between sexes.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** peptic ulcer (MESH:D010437), Acute Illness and Injury (MESH:D001930), deep vein thrombosis (MESH:D020246)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12614940/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12614940